Annals of emergency medicine
-
To define a subset of injured children for whom emergency cervical spine radiography may be unnecessary, we performed a retrospective chart and radiologic review. Two entry methods were used: All injured children, from birth through 16 years, who had received cervical spine radiographs at The Children's Memorial Hospital from September 1983, to September 1984, were included. All patients from birth to 16 years with proven or suspected cases of cervical spine injury who had received cervical spine radiographs and who had been treated at either the Children's Memorial Hospital or the Northwestern University Spine Trauma Unit during period 1974 to 1984 also were included. ⋯ Cervical spine radiographs could have been avoided in 79 children (38% of the entire sample). This algorithm performed better than did models derived from logistic regression analysis of the same data. Validation trials are required prior to the implementation of this or other clinical decision algorithms in practice.
-
We tested a 20-gauge, 2 1/2-inch spinal needle and a 13-gauge, 3 1/2-inch bone marrow needle with Ringer's lactate delivered by gravity and 300 mm Hg pressure in vitro and in hypovolemic puppies to ascertain in vivo intraosseous flow rates and to determine the effects of catheter size and anatomic factors on flow rate. In vitro flow was significantly faster than in vivo flow (P = .001). In vivo, mean flow rates were 11 mL/min for the 20-gauge needle and 13 mL/min for the 13-gauge needle by gravity. ⋯ While the in vivo flow rates were significantly greater for the 13-gauge versus the 20-gauge needle, the differences were not clinically significant (2 mL/min difference by gravity and 5 mL/min difference by pressure). The clinically comparable in vivo rates for the two needles tested indicated that the rates are dependent on flow through the bone marrow rather than the size of the needle. The data suggest that while intraosseous infusion is a rapid technique for gaining vascular access, the flow rates achieved may not be sufficient for the definitive treatment of severe hypovolemic or hemorrhagic shock alone.