Annals of emergency medicine
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Recalibration of the pediatric risk of admission score using a multi-institutional sample.
Case-mix adjustment is a critical component of quality assessment and benchmarking. The Pediatric Risk of Admission (PRISA) score is composed of descriptive, physiologic, and diagnostic variables that provide a probability of hospital admission as an index of severity. The score was developed and validated in a single tertiary pediatric hospital emergency department (ED) after exclusion of children with minor injuries and illnesses. We provide a multi-institutional recalibration and validation of the PRISA score and test its performance in 4 additional EDs, including patients with minor injuries and illnesses. ⋯ The PRISA score has been recalibrated and performs well in EDs of tertiary pediatric hospitals. Comparison with this benchmark may allow individual EDs to improve their performance and may provide insight into best practices.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Vagal response varies with Valsalva maneuver technique: a repeated-measures clinical trial in healthy subjects.
Variable success rates of the Valsalva maneuver in treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia may be due to variations in performance technique. This study aimed to compare the magnitude of the vagal reflexes initiated by 5 variations of the Valsalva maneuver technique (supine, supine with epigastric pressure, supine with leg raise, semirecumbent position, and sitting position). ⋯ For healthy subjects in sinus rhythm, the supine with epigastric pressure and supine techniques generated stronger vagal responses, as measured by R-R intervals and pulse rates, than the other techniques examined. However, the vagal responses of these 2 techniques were similar, and the addition of epigastric pressure may confer little advantage.
-
We evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and potential impact of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography, when applied in Canadian emergency departments (EDs). ⋯ This retrospective validation found the NEXUS low-risk criteria to be less sensitive than previously reported. The NEXUS low-risk criteria should be further explicitly and prospectively evaluated for accuracy and reliability before widespread clinical use outside of the United States.
-
Editorial Comment Comparative Study
Comparison of the Canadian C-Spine rule and NEXUS decision instrument in evaluating blunt trauma patients for cervical spine injury.