Annals of emergency medicine
-
Meta Analysis
Effectiveness of emergency medical services for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a metaanalysis.
To determine the relative effectiveness of differences in response time interval, proportion of bystander CPR, and type and tier of emergency medical services (EMS) system on survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. ⋯ Increased survival to hospital discharge may be associated with decreased response time interval and with the use of a two-tier EMS system as opposed to a one-tier system. The data available for this analysis were suboptimal. Policymakers need more methodologically rigorous research to have more reliable and valid estimates of the effectiveness of different EMS systems.
-
Several studies have examined the effect of early defibrillation by basic EMTs on patient survival. Although the studies have a common theme of early basic EMT defibrillation, they are diverse in locations, devices, control groups, caregivers, and protocols. ⋯ The purpose of this metaanalysis was to examine the published studies of early basic EMT defibrillation to learn whether this treatment has an effect on survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Analysis of the 10 studies that met inclusion criteria showed that despite variations in design, the overall effect size for all the studies was .092, indicating a 9.2% increase in survival over what would have been expected had the EMT-Ds not intervened.
-
Meta Analysis
Effect of out-of-hospital defibrillation by basic life support providers on cardiac arrest mortality: a metaanalysis.
Although some studies demonstrate otherwise, we hypothesized that metaanalysis would demonstrate a reduction in the relative risk of mortality when basic life support (BLS) providers can defibrillate out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. ⋯ BLS defibrillation can reduce the relative risk of death for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims in ventricular fibrillation. Weaknesses in individual study designs and regional clustering limit the strength of this metaanalysis and conclusion.
-
Meta Analysis
Antibiotics to prevent infection in patients with dog bite wounds: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
To determine whether prophylactic antibiotics prevent infection in patients with dog bite wounds. ⋯ Prophylactic antibiotics reduce the incidence of infection in patients with dog bite wounds. The full costs and benefits of antibiotics in this situation are not known. It may be reasonable to limit prophylactic antibiotics to patients with wounds that are at high risk for infection.
-
To add to our understanding of survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest studies, we examined the incidence of cardiac arrest in the published literature. We specifically estimated if incidence rates are uniform between communities and if any relationship exists between incidence and the reported survival rates. ⋯ The marked variations in incidence and inverse relationship between incidence and survival could be due to true variation in risk among the populations reported (ie, some populations may be older or sicker than others). Also, different research methodologies may create artifactual differences among studies as standards for designing studies, terminology, and reporting data have not been uniform. Therefore, these findings may reflect methodological differences and true epidemiological differences among communities. Future reports should include a method, such as an incidence/survival nomogram, to analyze survival rates while taking into account the community incidence rate of cardiac arrest. Further analysis of incidence and survival is necessary to improve intersystem comparisons, a prerequisite to sound decisions about cardiac arrest treatment, health policy, and allocation of resources.