The Journal of hospital infection
-
Comparative Study
Efficacy of specific aseptic precautions for preventing propofol-related infections: analysis by a quality-assurance programme using the explicit outcome method.
Specific aseptic precautions have been recommended for preventing infectious complications of propofol because its lipid base can support bacterial growth if contaminated. To study whether the precautions used at our institution prevent propofol-related infections, we retrospectively analysed the data covering 1 January, 1995 until 30 June, 1996 held in our quality-assurance database. The database contains prospectively collected, detailed and standardized information of each patient's risk factors, anaesthetic and surgical data, and postoperative outcome. Surgical patients who had received propofol for anaesthesia did not have a higher incidence of postoperative infection, thus demonstrating the efficacy of our aseptic precautions.
-
Hand disinfectants containing chlorhexidine are thought to be less bactericidal against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) than methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). We report an in vitro comparison between three distinct MRSA strains and three MSSA strains. The bactericidal efficacy of chlorhexidine digluconate, 'Hibiscrub' and 'Hibisol' against Staphylococcus aureus was determined in a quantitative suspension test. ⋯ Chlorhexidine digluconate and 'Hibisol' showed RF > 5 at most concentrations and reaction times but 'Hibiscrub' did not. MRSA was found to be significantly less susceptible than MSSA to chlorhexidine digluconate, 'Hibiscrub' and 'Hibisol' (P < 0.05; two-tailed t-test for independent samples). 'Hibisol' was significantly more effective against MRSA than 'Hibiscrub' (P < 0.05). Hand disinfectants containing both alcohol and chlorhexidine (e.g., 'Hibisol') are more effective against MRSA than scrubs based only on chlorhexidine ('Hibiscrub') and should be used in clinical practice.
-
Fungal infection in critically ill patients is an increasingly prevalent problem. Candida spp. cause the majority of these infections in ICU. They occur most commonly in patients with severe underlying illness, multiple courses of antibiotics and intravascular catheters. ⋯ Most patients are diagnosed using inferential evidence of infection, such as persistent pyrexia despite antibiotics, raised serum C-reactive protein and the presence of individual risk factors. Amphotericin B and fluconazole are the most commonly used anti-fungals dependent on the identity of the fungus. Most of these infections are endogenous; however, a proportion may be caused via the hands of healthcare staff or contaminated medical equipment.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Frequency of parenteral exposure and seroprevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV among operation room personnel.
A study was designed to determine the frequency of needle-stick injuries, immunization status for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and sero-prevalence of HBV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections among operation room personnel. Self-assessment questionnaires were completed and blood tested for HBsAg, anti-HBc (total), anti-HCV and anti-HIV. Of 114 operation room personnel studied, the majority (58.8%) reported more than four needle-stick injuries per year, 36.8% one to three needle-stick injuries per year, while 4.4% reported no needle-stick injury in the last five years. ⋯ Four percent were reactive for HCV infection, 7.5% for HBsAg infection and 25.43% for anti-HBc (total); none was HIV positive. Eighty percent of the HCV positive and 55% of the anti-HBc (total) positive personnel had more than four needle-stick injuries per year in the last five years, while 75% HBsAg-reactive personnel had received one to three needle-stick injuries per year. This study indicates a need for continued efforts to minimize the risk of blood-borne infection by enhancing the compliance of operation room personnel with HBV vaccination and adherence to infection control measures.
-
One hundred and twenty-seven patients were studied prospectively for aerobic, anaerobic and fungal burn wound infections. All cases yielded organisms on culture. A total of 377 isolates were recovered (239 aerobes, 116 anaerobes and 22 fungi). ⋯ Seventeen patients presented with septic shock, 15 of them (88.2%) yielding positive anaerobic cultures. Bacteroides sp. were isolated from 14 patients with septic shock, and were recovered from the four patients who had anaerobic infection alone. These results indicate a significant role of Bacteroides sp. in burn wound sepsis.