The Journal of hospital infection
-
A retrospective survey was conducted at Bicêtre Hospital, France from January 2001 to September 2003 to screen for S. aureus isolates with a typical phenotype previously involved in necrotizing pneumonia in France. They were resistant to oxacillin and kanamycin, of intermediate susceptibility to fusidic acid, and susceptible to tobramycin and fluoroquinolones. Seventeen isolates were found and 16 were viable. ⋯ This retrospective study identified PVL-producing CA-MRSA in two Parisian hospitals. The incidence at Bicêtre Hospital was 0.8% of all S. aureus and 2% of all MRSA isolated. Our data indicate that these MRSA isolates might become hospital acquired.
-
The incidence of nosocomial infection in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is high compared with other wards. However, no definitions for hospital-acquired infection are available for NICUs. The aim of this study was to measure the incidence of such infections and to identify risk factors in the NICU of the VU University Medical Center, which serves as a level III regional NICU. ⋯ With the CDC criteria, only 75% (21/28) of bloodstream infections and 87.5% of pneumonias (21/24) would have been identified. In conclusion, our local nosocomial infection rates are high compared with those of NICUs participating in the NNIS. This can be partially explained by: (1) the use of our definitions for nosocomial infection, which are more suitable for this patient category; and (2) the high device utilization ratios.
-
We describe two concurrent outbreaks of Serratia marcescens and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Over a 16-month period, a total of 27 infants were either colonized (N=14) or infected (N=13). There were 15 cases of S. marcescens and 11 cases of K. pneumoniae. ⋯ Heterogeneous genotypes among both species were also demonstrated to be present in the NICU at the same time. A focal source for both micro-organisms was not identified but cross-transmission through handling was probably an important route in this outbreak. Strict adherence to handwashing policies, cohorting, isolation of colonized and infected patients, and rigorous environmental hygiene were crucial measures in the containment of the epidemic.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-centre clinical trial was performed to test the effectiveness of an antimicrobial central venous catheter (CVC) made of polyurethane integrated with silver, platinum and carbon black (Vantex). Adults expected to require a CVC for more than 60 h were eligible, and were randomized to receive the test or control catheter. All CVCs were inserted with new venipunctures using full aseptic technique. ⋯ Insertion site and dressing change frequency were significantly associated with the colonization rate. Although CVCs with antimicrobial features have been associated with a decrease in catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia, this study demonstrated that infection rates may depend more on non-catheter-related factors, such as adherence to infection control standards, selection of insertion site, duration of CVC placement, and dressing change frequency. As microbial resistance increases, clinicians should make maximal use of these processes to reduce catheter-related infections.
-
Increasing use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and other invasive procedures has raised the question of what ventilation facilities are appropriate for such procedures to prevent infection. The Hospital Infection Society (HIS) Working Party on Infection Control in Operating Theatres undertook a survey of practice in Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the ventilation facilities provided for a variety of MIS and other procedures. Five hundred and fifty questionnaires were forwarded to HIS members, and 186 (39%) replies were received. ⋯ In particular, many radiological and anaesthetic procedures are performed in treatment rooms or ventilated rooms with less than 20 air changes per hour. Whilst it is not clear whether this is acceptable practice given current knowledge, large-scale clinical trials to determine what standards of ventilation are appropriate to minimize infection for these types of procedures would be difficult to conduct. Research is needed on the relative risk of airborne infection for a variety of procedures, including whether all prosthetic implant procedures should be carried out in ultraclean ventilated theatres, as infection associated with implants is often of airborne origin and of considerable clinical significance.