American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation
-
Gram-negative bacterial sepsis remains a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma to the practicing clinician. Bacterial-derived products (eg, gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide or endotoxin) and host inflammatory mediators (eg, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1) are believed to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock. Despite the many advances in the treatment of sepsis, mortality rates in septic patients remain high. ⋯ Adsorbents developed for use in sepsis can bind toxins in a nonselective (eg, charcoal), selective (eg, polymyxin B-immobilized polystyrene-derivative fiber), or specific (eg, antibody-coated microsphere-based detoxification system) way. However, despite an explosive development in the experimental use of these promising therapies, randomized clinical trials are currently lacking. In summary, a multi-disciplinary complex therapeutic approach remains a prerequisite to the successful treatment of sepsis.
-
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU) requires a dedicated training and educational process that includes both theoretical and practical approaches. Important goals for this process include achieving an acceptable circuit life without patient complications and providing a high percentage of staff with bedside expertise. Lectures or didactic sessions must link into bedside instruction and simulations or mock patient/circuit setup. ⋯ Managers require a system of staff review to ensure expertise levels are maintained. Policy development, quality assurance, and complication monitoring systems provide useful information for managers and educators in this field. Credentialing may be useful to confirm the goals of CRRT, but it requires further development of practice standards before adoption.
-
Editorial Review Comparative Study
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a useful clinical tool in nephrology.
Hypertension is a key factor in the genesis and deterioration of many renal diseases and is also a risk factor for death in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the standard methods of measurement are prone to variability, especially in patients undergoing dialysis. The technique of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring allows a better assessment of overall blood pressure levels and promises to assume a bigger role in the care of renal patients. ⋯ The available evidence suggests that ambulatory blood pressure compared with blood pressure measured in the physician's office is better correlated to left ventricular mass in subjects with chronic renal disease. Furthermore, studies in subjects with chronic renal disease and those undergoing renal replacement therapy show that blood pressure control is suboptimal in many patients and that nocturnal blood pressure is generally higher than in control subjects. Further insights into overall blood pressure behavior in this population will certainly emerge in the future.
-
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is performed in critical care units around the world with various levels of involvement from critical care and nephrology nurses. In this article, factors affecting the delivery of nursing care and the particular expertise nephrology and critical care nurses have in the area of CRRT are examined. ⋯ Based on related research findings and a comparison of the models, the Collaborative Model is the preferred one, as it brings the highest level of expertise directly to the patient. For the Collaborative Model to work, a framework for collaboration and a high degree of commitment from both specialties must be maintained.
-
The arrival of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has given the intensivist and the intensive care nurse the opportunity to treat acute renal failure (ARF) independently by giving them the necessary technology and taking CRRT away from absolute nephrological control. This structural shift has created a controversy between those countries where control of CRRT has completely shifted to the intensivist and those countries where nephrological input is still dominant. The argument in favor of intensivist-driven CRRT rests upon several observations, including the fact that therapy is continuous, as is the presence of the intensivist in the intensive care unit (ICU). ⋯ Intensivists are successfully performing more and more procedures that were previously seen as part of other specialties and, last but not least, "closed" models of ICU care appear to work best. Australian intensivists have taken up CRRT from the start and now control it. Patient outcomes under such a system, as reported here, are above average, and confirm the effectiveness of such an approach.