Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association
-
This study sought to explore the impact of care recipient falls on caregivers. ⋯ Falls among care recipients have a significant impact on carers, including an increased fear of falling, prompting the need for even closer vigilance. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? Falls are a significant problem for older people as one in three older people fall each year and injurious falls are the leading cause of injury-related hospitalisation in older people. In Australia falls cost the economy over $500 million per year. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD? This paper adds a unique perspective to the falls literature, that of the older person's carer. Falls are a significant problem for community-dwelling carers of older people, contributing to carer burden and impeding the carer's ability to undertake activities of daily living because of the perceived need for constant vigilance to prevent the person they care for from falling. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? Practitioners should ensure that carers are aware of evidence-based falls-prevention practices and services, such as group and individual exercise programs, home modifications and podiatry, that might assist to prevent falls in the person they care for and therefore reduce the burden of care.
-
Waiting lists for elective surgery are a persistent problem faced by health systems. The progression through elective surgery waiting lists can be likened to a game of snakes and ladders where barriers (snakes) delay access to surgery and facilitators (ladders) expedite access. The aim of the present study was to describe the barriers and facilitators to delivery of total hip- and total knee-replacement surgery in South Australian public-funded hospitals. ⋯ Given the complexity of the elective surgery system, it is not surprising that single-item reforms have not created lasting reductions in waiting times. Multifaceted, whole-system reforms may be more successful. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? Waiting lists and waiting times for surgery are controversial, associated with frequent reforms and negative emotive headlines. We know from existing literature and anecdotal reports that individuals frequently experience lengthy delays before receiving elective surgery. Anecdotal reports also suggest that there are inefficiencies within elective surgery systems that contribute to these delays and result in cancellations, patient deterioration and poor overall satisfaction with the public health system in Australia. What isn't clear is whether this perception is accurate and what inefficiencies do exist that could be specifically targeted for reform. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD? This paper adds weight to the argument that some inefficiencies exist within elective surgery systems, and identifies specific barriers to the delivery of total hip- and total knee-replacement surgery in South Australian public hospitals. It also identifies several strategies that could improve system function, some of which have already been implemented at a local level in response to stress on the system, and some of which require broad region- or state-wide change. In contrast to existing research, the level of detail provided in the present paper should allow for targeted reforms with the potential to improve system function and the efficiency with which joint-replacement surgery can be delivered. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? All clinicians aim to provide the best intervention for their patients. Should the findings of this study be used to inform elective surgery system changes, patients and clinicians should experience a more streamlined approach to referral for and receipt of elective surgery in public hospitals. The consistency with which barriers and facilitators were identified across the four hospitals involved in this research supports the generalisability of the results. This further suggests that although specific to hip and knee replacement, many of the same barriers and facilitators could be in place across numerous surgical and non-surgical disciplines.
-
This paper describes the longitudinal component of a larger mixed methods study into the processes and outcomes of chronic condition management and self-management strategies implemented in three Aboriginal communities in South Australia. The study was designed to document the connection between the application of structured systems of care for Aboriginal people and their longer-term health status. ⋯ The outcomes reported here represent an initial and important step in quantifying the health benefits that can accrue for Aboriginal people living with complex chronic conditions such as diabetes, heart disease and respiratory disease. The study highlights the benefits of developing long-term working relationships with Aboriginal communities as a basis for conducting effective collaborative health research programs. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? Chronic condition management and self-management programs have been available to Aboriginal people in a range of forms for some time. We know that some groups of patients are keen to engage with care planning and self-management protocols and we have anecdotal evidence of this engagement leading to improved quality of life and health outcomes for Aboriginal people. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD? This paper provides early evidence of sustained improvement over time for a cohort of Aboriginal people who are learning to deal with a range of chronic illnesses through accessing structured systems of support and care. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? This longitudinal evidence of improved outcomes for Aboriginal people is encouraging and should lead on to more definitive studies of outcomes accruing for people engaged in structured systems of care. Not only does this finding have implications for the overall management of chronic illness in Aboriginal communities, but it points the way to how health services might best invest their resources and efforts to improve the health status of people with chronic conditions and, in the process, close the gap between the life expectancy of Aboriginal people and that of other community groups in Australia.
-
To develop and evaluate the implementation of a communication board for paramedics to use with patients as an augmentative or alternative communication tool to address communication needs of patients in the pre-hospital setting. ⋯ These results suggest that a communication board can be applied in the pre-hospital setting to support communication success with patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? It is imperative that communication between patient and paramedic is clear and effective. Research has shown that communication boards have been effective with people with temporary or permanent communication difficulties. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD? This is the first paper outlining the development and use of a communication board by paramedics in the pre-hospital setting in Australia. The paper details the design of the communication board for the unique pre-hospital environment. The paper provides some preliminary data on the use of the communication board with certain patient groups and its effectiveness as an alternative communication tool. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? The findings support the use of the tool as a viable option in supporting the communication between paramedics and a range of patients. It is not suggested that this communication board will meet the complete communication needs of any individual in this environment, but it is hoped that the board's presence within the Queensland Ambulance Service may result in paramedics introducing the board on occasions where communication with a patient is challenging.
-
To determine the spectrum of disease among non-urgent referrals to a tertiary hospital hepatology outpatient clinic, assess the adequacy of referral information in terms of risk stratification and determine whether a specifically designed referral template altered urgency for specialist assessment. ⋯ Hepatitis C virus accounts for the majority of non-urgent referrals waiting to access hepatology outpatient consultations. Using a standardised assessment form as part of the referral process provides more information on comorbidities and risk factors and facilitates more accurate triaging of clinical urgency. Wider adoption of this strategy may increase appropriate access to hepatology services and reduce the future burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? Little published data are available that describe the content and standard of hepatology referrals, or the urgency with which these patients need to be reviewed. Inadequate clinical information impairs the ability to accurately triage referrals and may lead to delays in access. WHAT DOES THE PAPER ADD? Almost 70% of reviewed referrals were for management of patients with hepatitis C virus infection, confirming this condition remains a major priority area in liver disease. Clinical information provided by referring clinicians was often incomplete, impairing the ability to accurately triage referrals. Only a minority of referrals provided information about relevant comorbidities (alcohol intake, injecting drug use, mental health issues and obesity) that negatively impact on the progression of liver disease or the response to antiviral treatment. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? Hepatitis C virus remains a major health priority area in liver disease, increasing the future burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. Many referred patients have comorbidities that increase their risk of progressive liver disease and related complications. Strategies to increase recognition and management of liver disease and its comorbidities in the community are required. The use of a standardised assessment form in referrals to hepatology outpatient services may assist with triaging of patients and improve access to appropriate care.