Emergency medicine clinics of North America
-
Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. · May 2005
ReviewLegal issues in pain management: striking the balance.
The momentum over the past several years resulting in positive change to state pain policy is encouraging, especially as the medical community meets greater expectations from patients for appropriate pain management. As the trend for increased medical use of opioid medications continue it is important that medical professionals continue to work with government officials to ensure efforts to curb drug abuse do not impede patient access to pain management. ⋯ In 2004, the Mayday Project at ASLME will host a national conference, with an emphasis on pain management in the emergency department. The previous noted success of Mayday Project activities should give all of us hope that through scholarly activity further guidance will be provided in finding that critical balance between effective pain management and drug diversion.
-
Chronic nonmalignant pain requires evaluation and treatment different from acute pain. The pathophysiology is different, and there is commonly some degree of psychosocial dysfunction. Opioids tend to be much less effective as analgesics for chronic pain, and may increase the sensitivity to pain when given long-term. ⋯ Consequently, emergency and urgent care physicians should work closely with the patient's pain management specialist or personal physician. Systems should be set up in advance to identify those patients whose frequent use of acute care services for obtaining opioids may be compromising their long-term management, putting themselves at risk for psychological and tolerance-induced adverse effects of frequent opioid use. Opioids may be used in carefully selected patients in consultation with their pain management specialist or personal physician, but care must be exercised not to initiate or exacerbate psychological or tolerance-related complications of chronic pain.
-
How have we as a profession, whose number-one goal is to decrease human suffering, made pain control such a poorly discussed issue in training? From day 1 of medical school, pain and suffering need to be discussed. No clinical area should be taught without discussion of this most common and most important symptom. ⋯ Alternatives to medications should be as much a part of our armamentarium as caring and compassion. The future of pain control depends on this paradigm shift.
-
Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. · May 2005
ReviewProcedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: what are the risks?
The practitioner of emergency medicine is routinely faced with patients in need of emergent procedures and pain control and sedation. Our challenge is to make our patients' experiences as painless and as safe as possible, while maximizing our ability to perform the procedure at hand; this is not always an easy task given the propensity of each human body to react differently to interventions and stimuli. We can best meet this challenge by understanding how our patients and pharmaceutical agents intermingle in the risk-benefit equation we formulate before starting our "experiment." Coupling this information with fundamentally sound patient care and monitoring will minimize bad experiences with PSA for both the patient and practitioner.
-
Drug-seeking patients include recreational drug abusers, addicts whose dependence occurred through abuse or the injudicious prescription of narcotics, and pseudoaddicts who have chronic pain that has not been appropriately managed. Opioids produce euphoria in some patients, providing the motivation for abuse, which can be detrimental even with occasional use. ⋯ For many patients, drug-seekers and chronic pain patients alike, withholding opioids may be an important part of their long-term management. For others, long-acting opioids such as long-acting morphine or methadone are a reasonable option.