Emergency medicine clinics of North America
-
Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. · May 2001
ReviewEchocardiography, nuclear scintigraphy, and stress testing in the emergency department evaluation of acute coronary syndrome.
There are between 3 and 5 million visits to EDs each year for complaints of chest pain. Of these, about one half of the patients have a noncardiac cause for their chest pain. Of the remainder, about 30% to 50% have significant coronary disease. ⋯ If the patient's risk profile has changed or the symptoms are new or more intense, the physician is compelled to pursue this encounter as a new, acute event. This can be true even in the setting of a previous cardiac catheterization that showed nonobstructive coronary disease, because plaque rupture can be acute and unpredictable. Ultimately, optimal care calls for each institution to develop a specific approach, in conjunction with their consultative cardiologist or critical care specialist, to enhance patient care, safety, and diagnostic outcome, while maintaining cost efficiency.
-
Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. · Feb 2001
ReviewManagement of patients with infectious diseases in an emergency department observation unit.
Pneumonia, cellulitis, and pyelonephritis are discussed in this review because they are the most common infections requiring hospital care, and they all have significant death or complication rates and broad differential diagnoses. They also demonstrate many of the considerations that could be applied to other infections appropriate for OU care. Table 11 lists additional infections that are good candidates for OU care. ⋯ These guidelines have been presented as a starting point. It is clear that more research targeted at this group of patients is required to refine current practice. As for everything else in medicine, there is no doubt that many of the specific recommendations made here will become obsolete in no time.
-
Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. · Feb 2001
ReviewIdentification of chest pain patients appropriate for an emergency department observation unit.
There are no perfect tests or algorithms to exclude ACI. Because acute coronary occlusion often occurs in patients with low-grade coronary stenosis, the diagnostic goal of a chest pain diagnostic protocol is not to identify patients with CAD, but rather to identify patients who may be safely discharged home without the development of complications such as MI, unstable angina, death, shock, or CHF over the next 1 to 6 months. There is an advantage to evaluating patients at the time of their symptoms. ⋯ The future direction probably will involve standardization of the ED chest pain population. This allows outcome and cost-effectiveness comparative research of various strategies for patients with normal or nondiagnostic ECGs and normal biomarkers. Although this approach allows more precise stratification, the risk will never be zero, meaning that there will never be a substitute for good clinical judgment and close follow-up care.
-
Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. · Feb 2001
ReviewStress testing for risk stratification of patients with low to moderate probability of acute cardiac ischemia.
In summary, this article focused on the use of stress testing to risk-stratify patients at the conclusion of their emergency evaluation for ACI. As discussed, those patients in the probably not ACI category require additional risk stratification prior to discharge. It should be kept in mind that patients in this category are heterogeneous, containing subgroups at both higher and lower risk of ACI and cardiac events. ⋯ Prognostic information is the key to provocative testing in the ED. Prognostic information is the component that will help emergency physicians identify the patients who may be discharged home safely without having to worry about a 6% annual cardiac death rate and a 10% overall death rate over the next 30 months. Stress testing provides this key prognostic data, and it can be obtained in short-stay chest pain observation units in a safe, timely, and cost-effective fashion.
-
Emergency department observation units are the rational choice for improving the utilization of health care resources and at the same time improving the quality of patient care. Potential pitfalls can be avoided by flexibility on both the part of the observation unit and the hospital administration staff. The continued growth of observation medicine throughout the country is evidence that most have been successful in designing creative solutions to accommodate this new health service.