Cancer investigation
-
Cancer investigation · Jan 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialRandomized double-blind comparison of single high-dose ondansetron and multiple standard-dose ondansetron in chemotherapy-naive pediatric oncology patients.
This prospective, double-blind, randomized study compares the antiemetic efficacy of an equivalent dose of ondansetron administered as a single high dose or as multiple standard doses in pediatric oncology patients. Thirty-one chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized at diagnosis to receive either single high-dose ondansetron (0.6 mg/kg, maximum dose 32 mg) or multiple standard-dose ondansetron (0.15 mg/kg, maximum dose 8 mg, every 4 hr for four doses). Antiemetic efficacy was assessed by an emesis scale described as follows: 1, no nausea or emesis; 2, nauseous but able to eat; 3, nauseous and unable to eat; and 4, emesis. ⋯ No patient experienced any clinical or laboratory toxicity. Our study suggests that single high-dose ondansetron is as efficacious as the multiple standard-dose regimen and is well tolerated. Its use will facilitate the administration of ondansetron in pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy.
-
Metastatic prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Although most patients will respond to androgen ablation as initial systemic therapy, nearly all patients will develop androgen-independent prostate cancer (AI CaP) and will succumb to the disease. Advances in molecular biology have demonstrated mutations in and persistent expression of the human androgen receptor in metastatic disease. ⋯ The next generation of clinical trials should not consist of futile hormonal manipulations or repetitive chemotherapy. Therapeutic strategies aimed at circumventing molecular blocks to cell death or targeting unique cancer molecules and genes will be more likely to improve quality of life and longevity. Furthermore, the aggressive use of palliative care will ensure effective caring for patients and the healing of families in the absence of cure.
-
Cancer investigation · Jan 1999
Utility of routine postoperative laboratory studies in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum.
In an effort to lower healthcare costs, this study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of routine postoperative (PO) laboratory studies and determine whether abnormalities alter patient (PT) care. This was a retrospective review of 105 PTs undergoing elective curative resection for colorectal cancer. A serum electrolyte and liver panel and a hematologic panel were drawn in all PTs. ⋯ Potassium was replaced in 17 of 32 occasions in 14 patients where it was low. In this group of PTs, PO serum potassium, hemoglobin levels, and serum glucose in diabetics were the only values important in making therapeutic decisions. If laboratory studies can be streamlined into only those necessary, substantial savings in health care will be seen without sacrificing quality medical care.