Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Effect of oronasopharyngeal suction on arterial oxygen saturation in normal, term infants delivered vaginally: a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Oronasopharyngeal suction (ONPS) with a suction bulb at birth is a traditional practice in the initial management of healthy infants in Iran and many other countries. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of oronasopharyngeal suction (ONPS) with those of no suction in normal, term newborns delivered vaginally. A total of 170 healthy term infants of first and single uncomplicated pregnancies, with clear amniotic fluid, vaginal delivery and cephalic presentation, enrolled in the trial during labour. ⋯ Newborns receiving suction showed a statistically significant, lower mean partial carbon dioxide pressure (PCO2) and a significantly higher partial oxygen pressure (PO2) of umbilical artery. Although the differences were statistically significant, these were not considered clinically significant because values remained within normal ranges. According to this study, ONPS is not recommended as a routine procedure in normal, term infants delivered vaginally.
-
This report is based on an audit of the delivery outcome of a specific care pathway for women who had made a maternal request for caesarean section (MRCS). The study took place in a UK inner city National Health Service maternity unit with 6,000 births per year. All 31 multiparous and 16 nulliparous women on the pathway were included. ⋯ Of the 16 nulliparous women, six delivered by planned caesarean section; four delivered vaginally; four had an instrumental delivery and two had an emergency caesarean section. A designated multidisciplinary care pathway that incorporates education and support may have the potential to help more women to achieve a normal delivery. More research is needed to assess its potential for reducing unnecessary caesarean deliveries and for improving user experience.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Paracetamol vs dexketoprofen for perineal pain relief after episiotomy or perineal tear.
A randomised controlled trial was conducted to investigate efficacy of paracetamol and dexketoprofen trometamol for perineal pain relief after perineal repair. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive two doses of either 50 mg of intravenous dexketoprofen trometamol via slow i.v. infusion (Group I, n = 49) or 1,000 mg of paracetamol via intravenous infusion (Group II, n = 46). The main outcome measure was a VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain recorded at 1 h (VAS 1). ⋯ There was no difference among groups in terms of pain scores at the beginning (VAS 0). The pain was decreased in 70% of the patients in Group I and in 62% of the patients in Group II (p = 0.502). Both paracetamol and dexketoprofen are effective in perineal pain relief after episiotomy or perineal tear repair.
-
Review Comparative Study
Perioperative morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy compared with total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids.
The aim of the study was to systematically review and summarise existing evidence related to the perioperative morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy in comparison with abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids. A review of MEDLINE and EMBASE was carried out. The primary outcome was the major morbidity rate and secondary outcomes were uterine size, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, operating time and duration of hospital stay. ⋯ There was no significant difference in the rate of major morbidity (RR 0.94; 95% CI = 0.31, 2.81; p = 0.91) between the two operations. It was concluded that based on variable quality data from retrospective cohort studies, abdominal myomectomy and hysterectomy appear to have similar major morbidity rates for the uterine size up to 16-18 weeks. Well-designed trials with a standardised morbidity outcome and including uterine size greater than 18 weeks are required.