Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
-
This study sought to determine the clinical correlates of the demand and utilisation of labour analgesia resources by Nigerian women in labour. All consenting women were interviewed on arrival at the Unit and while in labour. Biodata, options for relief of labour pain, request for analgesia, method of analgesia, VAS score and cervical score at time of request for analgesia were obtained. ⋯ Cervical dilatation of <4 cm at presentation to the Unit and nulliparity were likely factors for pain treatment during labour (p = 0.001, chi2 test). There is poor utilisation of labour analgesia services. Improved antenatal information on labour analgesia may boost the utilisation of these resources by Nigerian women in labour.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A prospective, randomised, single-blinded, controlled trial comparing two topical anaesthetic modalities for the application of a tenaculum to the cervix.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of equivalent doses of lignocaine spray vs lignocaine jelly in reducing pain during the application of a tenaculum to the cervix. A total of 58 women undergoing hysterosalpingography were prospectively randomised to receive either two doses of 10% lignocaine spray or 1 ml of 2% lignocaine jelly (both doses equivalent to 20 mg of lignocaine base) topically onto the cervix before tenaculum attachment. There was no difference in pain scores (measured by visual analogue scale and 4-point verbal descriptor scale) between lignocaine spray and lignocaine jelly during the attachment of the tenaculum to the cervix. In conclusion, there was no difference in pain during tenaculum attachment to the cervix following topical application of equivalent doses of either lignocaine jelly or spray.
-
Comparative Study
Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: a retrospective study in a district general hospital.
A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. ⋯ Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected chi2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery.