Clinical nutrition : official journal of the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
-
Great interest has been raised by the possible protective role of vitamin D in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but objective data on 25(OH)vitamin D deficiency in hospitalized COVID-19 patients are not conclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of 25(OH)vitamin D deficiency in COVID-19 patients admitted to an Italian referral hospital and explore its association with clinical outcomes and the markers of disease severity. ⋯ Very low 25(OH)vitamin D levels were highly prevalent and suggestive of deficiency among our hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients, but low 25(OH)vitamin D levels were not associated with outcome variables. Whether 25(OH)vitamin D adequacy may influence clinical outcomes in COVID-19 and the unexpected correlation between higher 25(OH)vitamin D levels and mortality require further investigations by large intervention trials.
-
Vitamin D deficiency represents a pandemic health problem with a broad spectrum of clinical implications. Several studies have involved lower levels of vitamin D with inflammatory disorders including cardiovascular, autoimmune and infectious disease. Indeed, the pathophysiological mechanisms are still poorly ascertained. We aimed at evaluating the impact of cholecalciferol (25(OH)D) levels on the biomarkers of acute-phase response and inflammation in a large cohort of patients with cardiovascular disease. ⋯ The present study demonstrates that, among patients with cardiovascular disease, 25(OH)D deficiency is associated with a higher metabolic and clinical risk profile and with an elevation of cellular and humoral inflammatory parameters. Future dedicated studies should be, therefore, advocated in order to define whether 25(OH)D supplementation can modulate the mediators of the acute phase response and therefore potentially offer clinical and prognostic advantages on a broad spectrum of inflammatory disease.
-
Observational Study
Mortality associated with new risk classification of developing refeeding syndrome in critically ill patients: A cohort study.
Although refeeding syndrome (RFS) has been recognized as a potentially fatal metabolic complication, the definition of RFS has remained unclear. Recently, European researchers suggested an evidence-based and consensus-supported algorithm that consisted of a new RFS risk classification and treatment strategies for medical inpatients. The classification was based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) criteria for patients at risk of developing RFS. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of each applied new risk group and the association between the new classification and mortality in critically ill patients. ⋯ Approximately half the critically ill patients were categorized as high or very high risk based on the new risk classification. Furthermore, as the risk categories progressed, the 30-day in-hospital mortality increased. Early recognition of patients at risk of developing RFS may improve patient outcomes through timely and optimal nutritional treatment.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The effectiveness of a weight-loss Mediterranean diet/lifestyle intervention in the management of obstructive sleep apnea: Results of the "MIMOSA" randomized clinical trial.
Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), lifestyle interventions have also emerged as complementary therapeutic choices. We aimed to explore whether the addition of a weight-loss Mediterranean diet/lifestyle intervention to OSA standard care, i.e. CPAP prescription and brief written healthy lifestyle advice, has an incremental effect on improving OSA severity, over the effect of standard care alone. ⋯ A dietary/lifestyle intervention on top of standard care leads to greater improvements in OSA severity and symptomatology compared to standard care alone. Benefits are evident regardless of CPAP use and weight loss.
-
Early use of parenteral nutrition (early-PN), as compared with withholding it for one week (late-PN), in the PICU, has shown to slow down recovery from critical illness and impair long-term development of 6 neurocognitive/behavioural/emotional functions assessed 2 years later. Given that key steps in brain maturation occur at different times during childhood, we hypothesised that age at time of exposure determines long-term developmental impact of early-PN. ⋯ Critically ill children aged 29 days to 11 months at time of exposure were identified as most vulnerable to developmental harm evoked by early-PN. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV: NCT01536275.