The American journal of emergency medicine
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic.
To compare the efficacy of intramuscular ketorolac and meperidine in the emergency department (ED) treatment of renal colic, a prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted in an academic ED with 76,000 annual visits. Participants were volunteer ED patients with a diagnosis of ureterolithiasis confirmed by intravenous pyelogram. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a single intramuscular injection of either 60 mg ketorolac or 100 to 150 mg meperidine, based on weight. ⋯ Similar proportions of patients in each group were given rescue analgesia and admitted. Of patients who were discharged home without rescue, those treated with ketorolac left the ED significantly earlier than those treated with meperidine (3.46 v 4.33 h, P < .05). These results show that intramuscular ketorolac as a single agent for renal colic is more effective than meperidine and promotes earlier discharge of renal colic patients from the ED.
-
Myocardial involvement by malignant neoplasm is rare and often not clinically manifested. The diagnosis is usually made only at autopsy. A 71-year-old man with squamous cell lung cancer presented with chest discomfort. ⋯ The echocardiography showed a huge hyperechoic mass located in the posterolateral aspect of the left ventricle with myocardium invasion. Thrombolytic therapy was withheld. In patients with lung cancer, an electrocardiogram representative of acute myocardial infarction can rarely be induced by myocardial involvement with lung cancer.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Provision for clinic patients in the ED produces more nonemergency visits.
This study sought to evaluate how the addition of a general practitioner (GP) surgery influences the utilization of an emergency department (ED). An intervention trial with historical control was conducted in a Swedish university hospital ED. A GP surgery was established in the ED by the addition of GP physicians without the addition of other personnel (nurses, secretaries, aids). ⋯ The percentage of patients managed in the ED who had nonurgent complaints (primary health care needs) increased with the intervention from 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19%, 25%) to 33% (95% CI 30%, 37%). The increased demand on the ED of patients with nonurgent complaints increased the average waiting time for patients with urgent or emergent complaints from 35 minutes to 40 minutes (14%). The introduction of GPs to an ED increased the number and proportion of patients presenting to the ED with nonurgent complaints.
-
A prospective, consecutive study was performed to determine if medical student supervision in the emergency department (ED) changes patient throughput time (ie, the time from triage to discharge). The mean patient throughput time on days when medical students were present in the ED (group 1) was compared to the mean patient throughput time on days when medical students were absent from the ED (group 2). Throughput time was measured in minutes. ⋯ The two groups were also compared for mean daily acuity (as gauged by mean daily number of patient admissions) and mean daily patient census. The differences in mean daily throughput times (group 1, 145.2 min v group II, 150.6 min; P = .40), mean daily census (group 1, 28.1 patients v group 2, 28.1 patients; P = .75), and mean daily admissions (group 1, 10.4 patients v group 2, 10.7 patients; P = .74) were all insignificant. Precepting medical students in this ED did not significantly change patient throughput times.
-
Disposal of sharp instruments and needles ("sharps") is an ongoing problem in the emergency department (ED). Cleanup and disposal of needles and other sharps after a procedure is the responsibility of all ED personnel, including physicians. ⋯ All techniques are designed to be done (1) without exposing physician to a needle stick, (2) with equipment readily available in the ED, and (3) with containers readily seen by those disposing of the sharps and other materials. Adherence to these cleanup procedures should help lessen the problem of sharps and disease exposure in the ED.