The American journal of emergency medicine
-
This study reviewed 549 malpractice claims filed against emergency physicians in Massachusetts from 1975 through 1993, with a total of $39,168,891 of indemnity and expense spent on the 549 closed claims. High-risk diagnostic categories (chest pain, abdominal pain, wounds, fractures, pediatric fever/meningitis, epiglottitis, central nervous system bleeding, and abdominal aortic aneurysm) accounted for 63.75% of all closed claims and 64.23% of the total indemnity and expense spent on closed claims. Missed myocardial infarction (chest pain) claims accounted for 25.47% of the total cost of closed claims but only 10.38% of closed claims. ⋯ The frequency of high-risk claims decreased in the post-1988 group, largely because of the decline in fracture and wound claims. The category of missed myocardial infarction had a larger percentage of claims closed with indemnity payment than without indemnity payment. This parameter may serve as a marker for the overall seriousness of claims associated with a particular allegation, unlike the average cost per claim, which may be skewed by a few large awards.
-
This study examined the concordance of radiographic readings between emergency department (ED) attending physicians and radiologists in a community teaching hospital. In addition, the incidents of misinterpretations leading to an alteration in patient care were also reviewed. All radiographs obtained from January through October 1993 were initially interpreted by ED attending physicians with subsequent final review by attending radiology staff. ⋯ The most frequently obtained radiographs included: chest, 7,012 (0.33% MR-FU); cervical spine, 1,112 (0.18% MR-FU); ankle, 758 (0.66% MR-FU); knee, 633 (0.32% MR-FU); and foot, 621 (0.97% MR-FU). In this study, 99.0% of all emergency department radiographs were read correctly on initial review by ED attending physicians. Of all misread radiographs, less than half (46%) were deemed clinically significant and required a follow-up intervention.
-
The metered-dose inhaler (MDI) techniques of 125 asthma patients who presented to a county hospital emergency department (ED) were evaluated. Correct technique was divided into 7 steps. Twenty-one percent of the patients performed all 7 steps correctly. ⋯ The Vitalograph Aerosol Inhalation Monitor was used to verify correct patient technique and as a teaching aid with variable success. Education in proper use of the MDI is important in the overall care of the asthma patient; however, instruction requires a definite time commitment and may not be feasible for all patients in a busy ED. For some patients, alternatives that require less lengthy instruction, such as the use of breath-actuated devices, spacers, and reservoirs, may be required.
-
A study was undertaken to determine the extent to which physician assistants (PAs) and/or nurse practitioners (NPs) are a source of health care delivery in emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Survey (NHAMCS) uses a multistage probability sample that examines patient visits within EDs. The sample included 437 hospitals with EDs. ⋯ When types of visits are analyzed, including reasons for ED care, diagnosis, and treatment, it appears that visits associated with care by ED-based PA/NPs are similar to all ED visits, including those attended by emergency medicine physicians. More studies are needed to better understand the role of PAs and/or NPs in various ED settings. Recruitment and use of PAs and NPs may be a cost-effective strategy for improved delivery of emergency services.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intramuscular prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide as single-agent therapy for the treatment of acute migraine headache.
To compare the efficacy of intramuscular prochlorperazine and metoclopramide in the short-term treatment of migraine headache in the emergency department 86 eligible adult patients with moderate to severe migraine headache were evaluated prospectively at a university-affiliated community hospital. After randomization, each subject received a 2-mL intramuscular injection of sterile saline, prochlorperazine (10 mg), or metoclopramide (10 mg). No other analgesics were administered during the 60-minute study period; patient assessment of relief was followed using visual analog scales. ⋯ Similarly, symptoms of nausea and vomiting were significantly relieved in the prochlorperazine group (chi 2 = 17.1, P < .001). However, rescue analgesic therapy was necessary in the majority of patients treated with prochlorperazine (16/28) and metoclopramide (23/29) after the 60-minute study period. Although intramuscular prochlorperazine appears to provides more effective relief than metoclopramide, these results do not recommend either drug as single-agent therapy for acute migraine headache.