Resuscitation
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The rapid infusion system: a superior method for the resuscitation of hypovolemic trauma patients.
The rapid infusion system (RIS), which can deliver fluids/blood products rapidly at precise rates and normothermic conditions, was compared with conventional fluid administration (CFA) in a randomized study of 36 hypovolemic trauma patients. Admission stratification criteria of the groups were similar relative to age, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and plasma lactate. Despite the lack of difference in blood loss between the 24-h survivors of the two groups, the CFA group required greater total fluids (23.6/20.21), red blood cells (5.5/4.61), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (2.8/1.91), platelets (523/204 ml), and crystalloids (12.9/10.61). ⋯ The PTT and PT were related to the degree of lactic acidosis (P = 0.0001) and hypothermia (P = 0.001) but not to the amount of FFP given (P = 0.14). The hospital costs, days in the ICU, and days on the ventilator were greater for the CFA group, as was the incidence of pneumonia (0/11 vs. 6/17; P = 0.03). Hypovolemic trauma patients resuscitated with the RIS needed fewer fluid/blood products and had less coagulopathy; more rapid resolution of hypoperfusion acidosis; better temperature preservation; and fewer hospital complications than those resuscitated with conventional methods of fluid/blood product administration.
-
Awareness during anesthesia is as old as anesthesia itself. Using muscle relaxing drugs, operations can be done on a relaxed but fully aware patient. ⋯ This article reviews the subject from some aspects including its causes, signs, tests and medico-legal points. Awareness during anesthesia can be looked at as 'the invisible scars of surgery.'
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with cardiopulmonary bypass after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Reperfusion pressures and neurologic recovery.
Resuscitability and outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest were compared in dogs with standard external cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) vs. closed-chest emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was with no blood flow from VF 0 min to VF 10 min. Subsequent CPR basic life support (BLS) was from 10 min to VF 15 min. ⋯ Ten dogs in each group followed protocol and survived to 96 h. Five of ten in group I and six of ten in group II were neurologically normal (NS). We conclude that: (1) Reperfusion with CPB yields higher coronary perfusion pressures than reperfusion with CPR-ALS; and (2) even after no blood flow for 10 min, optimized CPR can result in cardiovascular resuscitability and neurologic recovery, similar to those achieved by CPB.
-
In a region with a population of 250,000 people, all emergency calls for cardiac arrest were prospectively registered during a period of 6 years. Timing of events were carefully registered as were treatment and the participation of 3 ambulances equipped with defibrillators. When time until initial treatment of cardiac arrest was below 5 min, 12% could be resuscitated and discharged alive. ⋯ S. A. In those cases where treatment could be initiated within 5 min, results were comparable.
-
A previously established model in awake rats of hemorrhagic shock (HS) with 25% spontaneous survival rate (without resuscitation) was used to evaluate the effects of 4 novel life-supporting first aid (LSFA) measures on survival time and rate. After shed blood volume (SBV) of 3.25 ml/100 g, withdrawn over 20 min, hemodynamic and respiratory responses were recorded to 3 h and survival to 24 h. ⋯ Compared with group I, median survival times during HS 0-3 h were longer in groups II and III; and self-resuscitation attempts were longer in groups II, III and IV. We conclude that in untreated severe hemorrhagic shock, chances of survival to delayed arrival of advanced life support with i.v. fluid resuscitation might be increased with O2 inhalation and/or moderate external cooling.