Resuscitation
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Optimal defibrillation strategy and follow-up of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The Belgian CPCR Study Group.
In the current climate of rising healthcare cost, resuscitation efforts performed outside the hospital are critically evaluated because of their limited success rate in some settings. As part of a quality assurance program between the 1st January 1991 and 31st December 1993, six centres of the Belgian CPCR study group prospectively registered cardiac arrest (CA) patients and their treatment according to the Ustein Style recommendations. ⋯ In a second part of the study we describe long-term management of the 28 surviving VF patients, treated by the single EMS system of Brugge between 1st January 1991 and 30th April 1995: only 6 patients eventually received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), whereas coronary revascularization was performed in 9 patients, and 3 patients were discharged on amiodarone only. Satisfactory long-term survival after out-of-hospital VF can be achieved by an early shock followed by advanced life support and appropriate definitive treatment.
-
The outcome following a cardiac arrest is affected by the length of time that elapses before cardiopulmonary resuscitation is initiated. Only 10-15% of patients experiencing cardiac arrest in hospital settings survive to discharge. Therefore, the time between cardiac arrest and administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a metropolitan hospital was examined. ⋯ Also in 37% of the cases where a BVM was needed, one was not readily present because of difficulty in locating the crash cart immediately. Although initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within a minute of a cardiac or respiratory arrest is the standard of care, in the non-intensive care in-patient cases surveyed, typically more than a minute elapsed, and frequently 3 or more minutes, before resuscitation was started. If the time elapsing before an arresting in-patient is ventilated can be shortened, which is easily and effectively achieved by mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-mask resuscitation, an increase in both the survival rate and the number of good neurological outcomes should be expected.
-
When a cardiac arrest occurs in a non-intensive area of the hospital, the emergency response is not always adequate from the point of view of timeliness and technical quality. The aims of this study were evaluate an experimental programme to improve the CPR skills of staff operating in non-intensive areas of our general hospital and to test the usefulness of placing automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) within these areas. In the experimental phase, two AEDs were placed in 2 non-intensive wards of our hospital for 8 months. ⋯ The number and the quality of these uses seem to confirm the favourable impact of the adoption of a more user-friendly defibrillator, such as an AED. The active co-operation between intensive and non-intensive staff was important to facilitate a quick activation of the chain of survival outside the intensive care units. We conclude that AEDs, which were developed for out-of-hospital use by non-physician operators, are suitable for use inside the hospital as well.