Resuscitation
-
Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are used with increasing frequency in the United States by first responders (FR) such as police officers (PO) or firefighters (FF). However, FR satisfaction with use of AEDs has not been investigated. We hypothesized that FR satisfaction is comparable with that of paramedics (PA) and that, among those who have defibrillated with AEDs, those who have restored a pulse before PA arrival have a higher level of satisfaction than those who have not restored a pulse. ⋯ FR demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with using AEDs, and also had a favorable attitude toward implementation of AED use. Restoration of a pulse was clearly a factor responsible for a higher satisfaction. This positive attitude should encourage further implementation of early defibrillation programs in non-medical first responder settings.
-
Comparative Study
Simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves short-term survival rate in canine cardiac arrests.
We have reported previously that simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (SST-CPR) using a device that compresses the sternum and constricts the thorax circumferentially during a compression systole that can be achieved using standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR). This study was designed to assess whether SST-CPR improves the survival rate of dogs with cardiac arrest compared with STD-CPR. Twenty-nine mongrel dogs (19-31 kg) were enrolled in this study. ⋯ SST-CPR resulted in a significantly (P<0.001) higher systolic arterial pressure (91+/-47 vs 47+/-24 mmHg), diastolic pressure (43+/-24 vs 17+/-10 mmHg), coronary perfusion pressure (35+/-25 vs 13+/-9 mmHg), and end tidal CO(2) tension (9+/-4 vs 3+/-2 mmHg). Two of 15 animals (13%) resuscitated by STD-CPR and seven of 14 animals (50%) resuscitated by SST-CPR survived for 12 h after cardiac arrest (P<0.05). In conclusion, SST-CPR improves the short-term survival rate in canine cardiac arrest compared with STD-CPR.
-
The use of vasopressin instead of adrenaline/epinephrine during resuscitation improves vital organ perfusion, but the effects on mesenteric perfusion following successful resuscitation are not fully evaluated. The present study was designed to compare the effects of vasopressin and adrenaline/epinephrine, given to rats during resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation, on to mesenteric ischaemia, as determined by intestinal mucosal tonometer pCO(2) during the postresuscitation period. ⋯ We conclude that in this rat model the administration of vasopressin instead of adrenaline/epinephrine for CPR tends to be associated with lower resuscitation success, but less mesenteric ischaemia during the postresuscitation period in successfully resuscitated rats.
-
We report the survival of a multiply injured patient with exanguinating haemorrhage and an arterial pH of 6.5, following a road vehicle crash. The previously healthy 38 years old male driver veered off the motorway and collided with a tree. The ambulance arrived at the scene 9 min after being called by an eyewitness and, following rapid extrication from the wreckage; the patient arrived in hospital 27 min later (with a GCS of 6), and was immediately intubated. ⋯ Several factors may have contributed to the patient's survival: rapid retrieval from the scene; early intubation with excellent subsequent oxygenation (thus avoiding the dangerous combination of hypoxia and acidosis with synergistic influence on cardiac depression) and limited initial fluid resuscitation in the emergency department with prompt surgical intervention and vigorous restoration of organ perfusion after surgical haemostasis. Immediate operative haemostasis, coupled with restricted fluid administration beforehand and vigorous restoration of organ perfusion afterwards is now replacing the old resuscitation paradigm. Perhaps this shift in practice has helped this patient to survive.