Resuscitation
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Advanced life support performance with manual and mechanical chest compressions in a randomized, multicentre manikin study.
Clinical mechanical chest compression studies report diverging outcomes. Confounding effects of variability in hands-off fraction (HOF) and timing of necessary tasks during advanced life support (ALS) may contribute to this divergence. Study site variability in these factors coupled to randomization of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) method was studied during simulated cardiac arrest prior to a multicentre clinical trial. ⋯ In this manikin study, HOF for manual vs. mechanical chest compressions varied between sites. Study protocol implementation should be simulation tested before launching multicentre trials, to optimize performance and improve reliability and scientific interpretation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training program with or without preparatory self-learning video: a randomized controlled trial.
To evaluate the effectiveness of 1-h practical chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training with or without a preparatory self-learning video. ⋯ 1-h chest compression-only CPR training makes it possible for the general public to perform satisfactory chest compressions. Although a self-learning video encouraged people to perform CPR, their performance levels were not sufficient, confirming that practical training as well is essential. (UMIN000001046).
-
Ventilation of a non-intubated emergency patient by inexperienced rescuers with a standard bag-valve device may result in high inspiratory flow rates and subsequently high airway pressures with stomach inflation. Therefore, a self-inflating bag has been developed that requires lay rescuers to blow up a single-use balloon inside an adult bag-valve device, which, in turn, displaces air within the bag towards the patient. This concept has been compared to standard adult bag-valve devices earlier in bench models but not in patients. ⋯ Employing the mouth-to-bag resuscitator during simulated ventilation of a non-intubated patient in respiratory arrest significantly decreased peak inspiratory flow and peak airway pressure and increased inspiratory tidal volume and inspiratory times compared to a standard bag-valve device.
-
No previous study has investigated the safety of hand position during chest compression determined by the inter-nipple line, in which the heel of one hand is positioned on the centre of the chest between the nipples, from the standpoint of prevention of organ injury. ⋯ Simulation of hand position determined by the inter-nipple line resulted in placement of the rescuer's hands over the xiphoid process in nearly half of the patients. Hand deviation to the epigastric region may occur when the patient is a short-statured or elderly female, and when the rescuer is male.
-
High-fidelity manikins have been shown to be useful in teaching appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques. Similarity of manikin chest compression characteristics to real children is desirable. Little data exists on thorax stiffness in infants and children to guide manikin construction. ⋯ Experienced health care providers consistently identified and agreed on the manikin thorax stiffness which they felt best approximated downstroke chest compression stiffness of children and infants. Expert opinion can be used to create manikins with realistic spring stiffness for CPR training. Further study is needed to evaluate whether enhanced manikin biofidelity will improve CPR performance.