Resuscitation
-
Comparative Study
Synergistic effects of vasopressin plus epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Both epinephrine (Epi) and vasopressin (VP) increase coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) when administered during cardiac arrest. Given their different mechanisms of action we tested the hypothesis that during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) a combination of VP plus Epi would be superior to either agent alone. Epi(40 microg/kg), VP(0.3 U/kg) and the combination of both agents were assessed in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation (VF). ⋯ Post drug administration. 2 min, cerebral blood flow (ml/min per g) in the VP group (0.76 +/- 0.15) was more than two times higher compared with Epi alone (Epi:0.30 +/- 0.08, P < 0.01 versus VP) and Epi plus VP (Epi + VP:0.23 +/- 0.03, P < 0.01 versus VP). We conclude that combination of VP + Epi during cardiac arrest results in a more rapid rise in CPP when compared with VP alone and a more sustained elevation in CPP than observed with Epi alone. Thus, the synergistic effects of these two potent vasopressor agents may be of benefit during CPR.
-
The mechanism of blood flow in cardiopulmonary resuscitation remains controversial. Inconsistencies in the cardiac pump model necessitated the development of the thoracic pump. ⋯ We explore the mechanism and effect of this hypothesis and match it to previous observations. The implications to cardiopulmonary resuscitation are addressed.
-
Because closed chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCCPR) achieve restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in less than 50% of cases, and because of the apparent physiological superiority of open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OCCPR), we evaluated OCCPR in out-of hospital cardiac arrest in cases who did not respond to standard external cardiopulmonary resuscitation with advanced life support. Over a period of 12 years, OCCPR was performed in 33 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest arising from different causes, after unsuccessful attempts to achieve ROSC with CCCPR efforts over 7-121 min (median 25 min). With OCCPR, ROSC was achieved in 13/33 patients. ⋯ Our data suggest that OCCPR is more effective than CCCPR in achieving ROSC outside hospital in patients with major cardiac disease and prolonged arrest. OCCPR is feasible in the out-of-hospital setting. Survival without neurological deficit cannot be expected when CCCPR with no-flow is continued beyond 25 min.
-
Case Reports
Exogenous surfactant therapy in a patient with adult respiratory distress syndrome after near drowning.
A 24-year-old woman developed adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after near-drowning due to attempted suicide. Conventional mechanical ventilation together with prone positioning and inhaled nitric oxide could not provide sufficient oxygenation. Surface tension data (gamma min = 27 dyn/cm, stability index = 0.341) from a lavage sample supported the hypothesis that the surfactant function of this patient was drastically reduced due to a washout effect by aspiration of fresh water. ⋯ Surfactant application apparently led to a significant improvement of the respiratory function. However, the outcome could not be influenced positively. The high cost of surfactant therapy prevents the more widespread early administration in patients at risk.