Resuscitation
-
The resuscitation community is now moving towards a set of basic life support guidelines but different countries and training centres have their own individual methods of instruction. It would be advantageous if a universal testing method were available to facilitate intercentre comparison. This could lead to an international course which had been rigorously assessed and evaluated. ⋯ All subjects were tested without prior warning and video recorded for independent scoring by two researchers and a paramedic training officer. Scores were compared using the k correlation which showed a high level of agreement between observers. Video recording and marking using the CARE schedule and guidelines is a reliable method for assessing the preliminary steps in life support.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation in standing position over the patient: pros and cons of a new method.
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) has been introduced to improve outcome of CPR after cardiac arrest. Usually, ACD-CPR is performed with the rescuer kneeling beside the patient (ACD-B), but ACD-CPR with the rescuer in standing position (ACD-S) has been taught and applied in some centres in addition to conventional ACD-CPR (ACD-B). The aim of this randomised and cross-over study was to evaluate the new technique of ACD-S and to compare it with conventional ACD-B. ⋯ Compression forces decreased in ACD-S from 55.1 to 48.9 kp (P = 0.002) and in ACD-B from 52.8 to 47.0 kp (P = 0.069). We conclude that ACD-CPR in standing position can be considered equal to ACD-B in view of maximal duration of CPR, exhaustion of the rescuers and decompression forces. The decrease of compression forces in ACD-S and ACD-B as well as the difference between compression forces in ACD-S and ACD-B seem to be of no clinical relevance, and exhaustion was judged to be similar despite oxygen consumption being higher in ACD-S than in ACD-B.
-
Despite all the progress made in emergency medicine, out-of-hospital resuscitative efforts still remain unsuccessful in the majority of cases and a decision concerning termination of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has to be made. We used a multi-question survey to assess the attitude of emergency physicians towards the duration of an unsuccessful resuscitation attempt in non-traumatic cardiac arrest, and to identify the criteria affecting the decision to terminate CPR in the prehospital setting. More than 400 physicians participated in the inquiry on CPR in adults. ⋯ A high rate of respondents include criteria of weak diagnostic value such as the pupillary status, or factors of doubtful prognostic significance such as the patient's age. Concerning the patient's history and underlying diseases, the emergency physician often has to resort to presumptions. We conclude that the decision to terminate CPR is made by most physicians considering the specific circumstances of the cardiac arrest.