Resuscitation
-
Comparative Study
Effects of various degrees of compression and active decompression on haemodynamics, end-tidal CO2, and ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of pigs.
The effects of various degrees of compression and active decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were tested in a randomized cross-over-design during ventricular fibrillation in eight pigs using an automatic hydraulic chest compression device. Compared with 4/0 (compression/decompression in cm), mean carotid arterial blood flow rose by 60% with 5/0, by 90% with 4/2 and 4/3, and 105% with 5/2. Two cm active decompression increased mean brain and myocardial blood flow by 53% and 37%, respectively, as compared with 4/0. Increasing standard compression from 4 to 5 cm caused no further increase in brain or heart tissue blood flow whether or not combined with active decompression. Tissue blood flow remained unchanged or decreased when active decompression (4/3) caused that 50% of the pigs were lifted from the table due to the force required. Myocardial blood flow was reduced with 5/0 vs. 4/0 despite no reduction in end decompression coronary perfusion pressure ((aortic-right atrial pressure) (CPP), (7 +/- 8 mmHg with 4/0, 14 +/- 11 mmHg with 5/0)(NS)). End decompression CPP increased by 186% with 4/2 vs. 4/0, by 200% with 4/3, and by 300% with 5/2. Endo-tracheal partial pressure of CO2 was significantly increased during the compression phase of active decompression CPR compared with standard CPR. Active decompression CPR generated an significantly increased ventilation compared with standard CPR. ⋯ Carotid and tissue blood flow, ventilation, and CPP increase with 2 cm of active decompression. An attempt to further increase the level of active decompression or increasing the compression depth from 4 to 5 cm did not improve organ blood flow.
-
The outcome following a cardiac arrest is affected by the length of time that elapses before cardiopulmonary resuscitation is initiated. Only 10-15% of patients experiencing cardiac arrest in hospital settings survive to discharge. Therefore, the time between cardiac arrest and administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a metropolitan hospital was examined. ⋯ Also in 37% of the cases where a BVM was needed, one was not readily present because of difficulty in locating the crash cart immediately. Although initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within a minute of a cardiac or respiratory arrest is the standard of care, in the non-intensive care in-patient cases surveyed, typically more than a minute elapsed, and frequently 3 or more minutes, before resuscitation was started. If the time elapsing before an arresting in-patient is ventilated can be shortened, which is easily and effectively achieved by mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-mask resuscitation, an increase in both the survival rate and the number of good neurological outcomes should be expected.
-
Asystole in avalanche victims is generally due to asphyxia and not primarily to hypothermia. Hence, on-site establishment of death by asphyxiation would avoid evacuation risks to the rescue party, as well as high costs of transport to, and treatment at, frequently distant specialist centres in cases with a hopeless prognosis. ⋯ When information regarding an air pocket is uncertain in victims buried longer than 45 min, determination of serum potassium (critical level 10 mmol/l) at the nearest hospital becomes an alternative criterion for triage. The proposed guidelines aim to clarify field decision-making for the emergency doctor with respect to discontinuation of resuscitation and limitation of transferral for cardiopulmonary bypass core rewarming to those patients with presumptive reversible hypothermia.
-
When a cardiac arrest occurs in a non-intensive area of the hospital, the emergency response is not always adequate from the point of view of timeliness and technical quality. The aims of this study were evaluate an experimental programme to improve the CPR skills of staff operating in non-intensive areas of our general hospital and to test the usefulness of placing automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) within these areas. In the experimental phase, two AEDs were placed in 2 non-intensive wards of our hospital for 8 months. ⋯ The number and the quality of these uses seem to confirm the favourable impact of the adoption of a more user-friendly defibrillator, such as an AED. The active co-operation between intensive and non-intensive staff was important to facilitate a quick activation of the chain of survival outside the intensive care units. We conclude that AEDs, which were developed for out-of-hospital use by non-physician operators, are suitable for use inside the hospital as well.