Resuscitation
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Quality of mechanical, manual standard and active compression-decompression CPR on the arrest site and during transport in a manikin model.
The quality of mechanical CPR (M-CPR) was compared with manual standard CPR (S-CPR) and active compression-decompression CPR (ACD-CPR) performed by paramedics on the site of a cardiac arrest and during manual and ambulance transport. Each technique was performed 12 times on manikins using teams from a group of 12 paramedic students with good clinical CPR experience using a random cross-over design. Except for some lost ventilations the CPR effort using the mechanical device adhered to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines, with an added time requirement of median 40 s for attaching the device compared with manual standard CPR. ⋯ On the stairs, 68% of S-CPR compressions and 100% of ACD-CPR compressions were too weak. In conclusion, when evaluated on a manikin, in comparison with manual standard and ACD-CPR, mechanical CPR adhered more closely to ERC guidelines. This was particularly true when performing CPR during transport on a stretcher.
-
We present a case of open-chest cardiac massage where ventricular fibrillation developed and a direct current shock was required. In the absence of 'surgical' electrode paddles, standard paddle electrodes were used; one small electrode was placed directly on the exposed epicardial surface and the second electrode was placed on the lateral chest wall. Defibrillation was achieved with a 100 J shock. This combined epicardial-transthoracic electrode paddle placement technique allows defibrillation to be accomplished when open chest cardiac massage is being performed and no 'surgical' electrode paddles are available.
-
The aim of the study was to compare the effect of a 30 and 50% duty cycle on coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and to determine whether a duty cycle of 30% can be achieved manually. After 3 min of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, pigs were resuscitated in two groups with changing duty cycles every 3 min: group A starting with 50 and then 30%; and group B starting with 30 and then 50%. After administration of epinephrine, duty cycles in group A were 50 and then 30%, in group B initially 30% and then 50% Before administration of epinephrine, no significant differences in CPP between the 30 and 50% duty cycles were found; after epinephrine CPP increased with both duty cycles. ⋯ Survival was 4/6 in group A and 3/5 in group B (NS). It is possible to perform a manual duty cycle of 30%. However, our data do not support the use of a 30% duty cycle during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
-
In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial we tested the hypothesis that naloxone given during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) enhances cerebral and myocardial blood flow. Twenty-one anesthetized, normoventilated pigs were instrumented for measurements of right atrial and aortic pressures, and regional organ blood flow (radiolabeled microspheres). After 5 min of untreated fibrillatory arrest, CPR was commenced using a pneumatic chest compressor/ventilator. ⋯ Groups did not differ with respect to myocardial perfusion pressure or arterial blood gases at any time during the observation period. Regional brain and heart blood flows were not different between N and S at any point of measurement. We conclude that high-dose naloxone does not augment cerebral or myocardial blood flow during prolonged closed-chest CPR.
-
Standard external cardiopulmonary resuscitation (SECPR) frequently produces very low perfusion pressures, which are inadequate to achieve restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and intact survival, particularly when the heart is diseased. Ultra-advanced life support (UALS) techniques may allow support of vital organ systems until either the heart recovers or cardiac repair or replacement is performed. Closed-chest emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) provides control of blood flow, pressure, composition and temperature, but has so far been applied relatively late. ⋯ Other novel UALS approaches for further research include the use of an aortic balloon catheter to improve coronary and cerebral blood flow during SECPR, aortic flush techniques and a double-balloon aortic catheter that could allow separate perfusion (and cooling) of the heart, brain and viscera for optimal resuscitation of each. Decision-making, initiation of UALS methods and diagnostic evaluations must be rapid to maximize the potential for ROSC and facilitate decision-making regarding long-term circulatory support versus withdrawal of life support for hopeless cases. Research and development of UALS techniques needs to be coordinated with cerebral resuscitation research.