The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery
-
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg · Jul 2015
Comparative StudyDuplicate publications and related problems in published papers on oral and maxillofacial surgery.
As duplicate publication is unethical, our aim was to find out how common it is among published papers on oral and maxillofacial surgery. We used PubMed to identify index articles published in 2010 in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and the European Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, and searched for possible duplicate publications from 2008 to 2012 using the first or second and last authors' names. Suspected duplicates were categorised into "non-duplicate" (no overlap), "duplicate" (identical results and conclusions), or "salami-sliced" publications (part of the index article repeated or continued). ⋯ Of the 18 redundant publications, 9 did not reference the related index article. Duplicate material is still being published, and salami-slicing is relatively common among publications on oral and maxillofacial surgery. Further research is required into the extent and impact of this finding.
-
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg · Mar 2015
Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in oncological oral and maxillofacial operations: retrospective analysis.
We retrospectively analysed the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and associated risk factors in operations under general anaesthesia for cancer of the oral cavity. To identify symptoms related to deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), together with associated risk factors, we reviewed medical records of patients operated on in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom, between June 2007 and October 2012. All patients were categorised according to their level of risk of VTE. ⋯ Associations between the analysed factors and symptomatic VTE were not significant. The development of the complication in oncological oral and maxillofacial operations seems to be rare, even in patients with a high risk. We cannot recommend the use of routine thromboprophylaxis, but it could be advocated in patients with obvious serious risk factors.
-
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg · Feb 2015
Comparative StudyEffect of preoperative continuous positive airway pressure duration on outcomes after maxillofacial surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea.
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and is known to result in various physiological changes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between duration of preoperative CPAP therapy and outcome after maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) for OSA. We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients treated at our institution, and divided them into 2 groups based on duration of treatment with CPAP: short-term (up to 12 months) and long-term use (12 months or more). ⋯ Our results suggest that the duration of use of CPAP preoperatively does not significantly influence objective outcome measures. The reduction in AHI scores after MMA was equivalent in both groups. The long-term group seemed to fare better than the short-term group on subjective outcome measures.
-
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg · Jan 2015
Dental extractions and risk of bleeding in patients taking single and dual antiplatelet treatment.
Our aim was to evaluate the effects of single and dual antiplatelet treatment on postoperative bleeding in patients having dental extractions. The prospective clinical study included 160 patients who were taking antiplatelet drugs. The first group (n=43) were taking 2 drugs, mostly aspirin and clopidogrel, and the second group (n=117) were taking a single antiplatelet drug in the form of aspirin (n=84), clopidogrel (n=20), and ticlopidine (n=13). ⋯ The incidence of postoperative bleeding did not differ significantly among the three groups (χ(2)=4.3, p=0.11). However, the wound was sutured to achieve effective initial local haemostasis in 4/59 (6.8%) and 2/128 (1.6%) occasions of tooth extractions in the dual and single drug groups, respectively, and none in the control group (χ(2)=10.02, p=0.007). Patients taking single or dual antiplatelet drugs may have teeth extracted safely without interruption of treatment using only local haemostatic measures.
-
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg · Nov 2014
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyAnalgesic efficacy and safety of single-dose tramadol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in operations on the third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate published randomised, double-blind, clinical trials to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of tramadol with that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in operations on the third molars. We identified eligible reports from searches of PubMed, MedLine, the Cochrane Library, Oxford Pain Relief database, Imbiomed, and Google Scholar. The full text of studies that met our minimum requirements were evaluated using inclusion and exclusion criteria with the Oxford Quality Scale. ⋯ Probabilities of less than 0.05 were accepted as significant. The results showed that tramadol had less analgesic efficacy and an increased risk of adverse effects compared with NSAID. In conclusion, a single dose of tramadol was not as effective or as safe as NSAID for the relief of pain after operations on the third molars.