Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
-
Radiotherapy of recurrent head and neck tumours is limited in dose due to pre-treatment up to normal tissue tolerance doses. Surgery alone is limited by the problems related to pre-surgery, post-radiation fibrosis, and infiltration of tumours into nerves and vessels too closely to be completely removed. Our aim was to evaluate the possible role of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in such tumours treated with palliative intent. ⋯ Intraoperative irradiation can be used as a palliative treatment option in pre-treated head and neck tumours with satisfactory results. With large and infiltrating tumours, however, recurrences or tumour progression occur close to the IORT portals, thus rendering this method unsuitable for achieving long-term control in such extended tumours.
-
Comparative Study
Failure free survival following brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer: comparison with external beam radiotherapy.
To compare failure free survival (FFS) for brachytherapy (BT) alone and external beam radiotherapy (EBXRT) alone. ⋯ EBXRT and BT appear to be equally efficacious for low-risk patients having T(1)/T(2) disease with Gleason scores <6 and PSA <10 ng/dl. Patients with Gleason scores 8-10 or PSA >10 ng/dl-<20 ng/dl) appear to fare worse with BT alone compared with EBXRT. Neither EBXRT nor BT were particularly effective for patients with a presenting PSA >20 ng/dl.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with/without mitomycin C in head and neck cancers.
Radiation therapy is often the primary treatment for advanced cases of head and neck cancers not considered suitable for radical surgery. In these cases locoregional tumour control rates are low and has warranted innovative treatment modifications, such as altered fractionation schedules and combination with chemotherapy. ⋯ Following shortening overall treatment time from 7 weeks to 17 consecutive days and dose of radiotherapy from 70 to 55.3 Gy the results in the radiotherapy only treated patients are identical. A significant improvement regarding local tumour control and survival was seen following administration of MMC to the accelerated fractionated treatment.
-
With the recent development of hemopoietic growth factors and alternatives to transfusion, there has been a renewed interest in the relationships between anemia, tumor hypoxia and treatment outcome in a number of human malignancies. This review is intended to provoke a reconsideration of these issues and their effect on clinical trials, aimed at improving treatment outcome in patients with cervix cancer. ⋯ This review suggests that the relationships among anemia, hypoxia, transfusion and treatment outcome are complex. Further study of anemia as an independent prognostic factor is required and randomized studies of transfusion alternatives, such as erythropoietin, must be of sufficient size to detect small treatment effects.
-
Palliative radiotherapy constitutes nearly 50% of the workload in radiotherapy. Surveys on the patterns of practice in radiotherapy have been published from North America and Europe. Our objective was to determine the current pattern of practice of radiation oncologists in Canada for the palliation of bone metastases. ⋯ Local field external radiotherapy remains the mainstay of therapy, and the most common fractionation for bone metastases in Canada is 20 Gy in five fractions compared with 30 Gy in ten fractions in the US. Despite randomized trials showing similar results for single compared with fractionated radiotherapy, the majority of us still advocate five fractions. The frequency of employing a single fractionation has not changed since the last national survey in 1992. Nearly 70% use a standard dose fractionation to palliate localized painful metastasis by radiotherapy, independent of the site of involvement or tumor type. The pattern of practice of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases in Canada is different to that reported previously from the US. The reasons why the results of randomized studies on bone metastases have no impact on the patterns of practice are worth exploring.