Journal of vascular surgery
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Endovascular stenting versus open surgery for thoracic aortic disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative results.
Endovascular stenting has emerged as an alternative to open repair in patients requiring surgery for thoracic aortic pathology. A number of comparative series have been published but, to date, there has been no meta-analysis comparing outcomes following stenting as opposed to open surgery. ⋯ Endovascular thoracic aortic repair reduces perioperative mortality and neurological morbidity in patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. There may be less benefit in other thoracic aortic conditions.
-
Review Case Reports
Delayed presentation of aortic injury by pedicle screws: report of two cases and review of the literature.
Perforation of the aorta by pedicle screws is a rare but serious complication of spine fixation surgery. This article reviews the clinical presentation and management of this complication. ⋯ The small number of reported cases indicates either the rarity of this complication or unawareness of its existence. The true incidence of this complication is probably under-reported. Orthopedic and vascular surgeons should be aware of this potentially fatal problem. Prevention remains the best treatment. Once encountered, a variety of techniques are available to manage this complication with reasonable outcome.
-
This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of stent grafts in the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. ⋯ A prospective registry of all thoracic aorta procedures (endovascular treatment, open surgery, thoracic ESG plus extra-anatomic bypass) needs to be set up. All practitioners and stent graft manufacturers should contribute to this registry. It should include information on patient monitoring in order to (1) select patients who could be treated by ESG repair, (2) assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled study comparing ESG and surgery, (3) assess the medium-term outcome of different devices, and (4) obtain a better understanding of the health economics aspects.
-
Comparative Study
Patients with head and neck cancers and associated postirradiated carotid blowout syndrome: endovascular therapeutic methods and outcomes.
This study retrospectively evaluated the technical and hemostatic outcomes of reconstructive and deconstructive endovascular management in patients with head and neck cancers associated with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS). ⋯ There is no significant difference in technical and hemostatic outcomes between the reconstructive and deconstructive endovascular management methods. Hemostatic results were influenced by clinical severity. The rebleeding rate is higher in patients with advanced and acute clinical severity.