Journal of vascular surgery
-
Comparative Study
Claims-based surveillance for reintervention after endovascular aneurysm repair among non-Medicare patients.
Many patients who undergo endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVR) also undergo repeat procedures, or reinterventions, to address suboptimal device performance and prevent aneurysm rupture. Quality improvement initiatives measuring reintervention after EVR has focused on fee-for-service Medicare patients. However, because patients aged less than 65 years and those with Medicare Advantage represent an important growing subgroup, we used a novel approach leveraging a state data source that captures patients of all ages and with all types of insurance. ⋯ Reintervention can be monitored using administrative claims from both Medicare and non-Medicare payers, and serve as an important outcome metric after EVR in patients of all ages. The rate of reintervention seems to be similar between older, Medicare-eligible individuals, and those who are not yet eligible.
-
Quantification of carotid plaque morphology (geometry and tissue composition) may help stratify risk for future stroke and assess plaque progression or regression in response to medical risk factor modification. We assessed the feasibility and reliability of morphologic measurements of carotid plaques using computed tomography angiography (CTA) and determined the minimum detectable change in plaque features by this approach. ⋯ Carotid plaque geometry (total volume, diameter stenosis, and area stenosis) and tissue composition (calcium, LRNC, and IPH) are measured reliably from clinical CTA images using a semiautomatic image analysis program. The minimum change in plaque volume detectable is ∼4% if the same observer makes both measurements and ∼10% for different observers. Small changes in plaque composition can also be detected reliably. This approach can facilitate longitudinal studies for identifying high-risk plaque features and for quantifying plaque progression or regression after treatment.
-
Multicenter Study
iTalian RegIstry of doUble inner branch stent graft for arch PatHology (the TRIUmPH Registry).
The objective of this study was to assess early and midterm results after endovascular aortic arch repair using a double inner branch stent graft (DIBSG) in patients with aortic arch aneurysm or dissection unfit for open surgery. ⋯ Endovascular aortic arch repair using this model of DIBSG is feasible, and results are acceptable for a new technique in a high-risk subset of patients. Operative mortality suffers the effect of a learning curve, whereas midterm aorta-related survival is promising. Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with a DIBSG should always be considered to give high-risk patients a chance of repair. Large-scale studies are needed to assess the long-term durability of this technique.