Journal of vascular surgery
-
Comparative Study
Long-term single institution comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair and open aortic aneurysm repair.
Since the development of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), there remains concerns regarding its durability, need for secondary procedures, and associated long-term morbidity. We compared these two approaches to evaluate secondary interventions and their respective long-term durability. ⋯ EVAR requires more late secondary vascular interventions than open AAA repair, but patients who undergo open repair have more nonvascular long-term morbidity. Long-term survival is better after EVAR compared to open repair in this selected patient group.
-
Whether abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), without an identifiable endoleak, is a risk factor for AAA rupture remains controversial. To our knowledge, studies including large patient numbers investigating this topic have not been done. Therefore, a considerable number of conversions to open AAA repair have been performed in this patient group. This study evaluated AAA rupture risk in patients without detectable endoleaks but with AAA enlargement after EVAR treatment. ⋯ The risk of rupture in patients with an AAA enlargement of 8 mm after EVAR, without detectable endoleaks, is <1% in the first 4 years. No ruptures were seen in patients with AAA enlargement without detectable endoleaks who were not treated with Vanguard stent grafts (Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, Mass) and had AAA diameters <70 mm. For this group, conversion to open repair might not be mandatory, and regular follow-up can be advised instead. After 4 years of follow-up, this study observed an increased annual rupture risk, which might indicate the need for conversion; however, groups are small, and follow-up bias could play a role.
-
Prior studies have reported improved clinical outcomes with higher surgeon volume, which is assumed to be a product of the surgeon's experience with the index operation. We hypothesized that composite surgeon volume is an important determinant of outcome. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the impact of operation-specific surgeon volume versus composite surgeon volume on surgical outcomes, using open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair as the index operation. ⋯ The current study suggests that composite surgeon volume-not operation-specific volume-is a key determinant of in-hospital mortality for open AAA repair. This finding needs to be considered for future credentialing of surgeons.
-
To assess whether the preoperative level of deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHb) in the calf muscle during light-intensity exercise is useful for identifying patients at risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total knee or hip arthroplasty. ⋯ NIRS-derived RI >2.3 may be a promising parameter for identifying patients at risk of developing postoperative DVT despite pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis. A GV diameter of >0.25 cm also seems to contribute to the development of postoperative DVT. These results might be helpful to physicians for deciding which patients require more intensive thromboprophylaxis.
-
To identify preoperative clinical features that predict a durable improvement in renal function with renal artery stenting (RAS). ⋯ The current study found that a steep decline in preoperative renal function portends a higher likelihood of renal salvage from RAS among patients with renal insufficiency. Incorporating this finding into patient selection may improve outcomes for RAS.