Journal of vascular surgery
-
Male sex is a nonmodifiable risk factor for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development. Similar to humans, male mice are more susceptible to angiotensin II (AngII)-induced AAAs than female mice. Previous studies demonstrated that castration of males markedly reduced the formation of AngII-induced AAAs. Progression of AAA size is associated with increased risk of aneurysm rupture. In this study, we hypothesized that castration of male mice would reduce the progression of established AngII-induced AAAs. ⋯ There are no therapeutics that slow the progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and as the size of an AAA increases, so does the risk of rupture and death. Male sex is a nonmodifiable risk factor for AAA development, but whether male sex hormones have a similar effect on AAA progression is unclear. Removal of male sex hormones in an established mouse model of angiotensin II-induced AAAs resulted in reduced progressive lumen dilation while not altering external AAA dimensions. Therapies that limit androgen action may provide benefit against AAA progression. Alternatively, supplemental testosterone may be contraindicated in men diagnosed with an AAA.
-
Previous reports have documented better outcomes after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in tertiary centers compared with lower-volume hospitals, but outcome variability for endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) vs open AAA repairs in a large tertiary center using a Medicare-derived mortality risk prediction model has not been previously reported. In the current study, we compared the observed vs predicted mortality after EVAR and open AAA repair in a single large tertiary vascular center. ⋯ Despite treating patients with high preoperative risk status, we report a 10-fold decrease in operative mortality for EVAR and open AAA repair in a tertiary vascular center compared with national Medicare-derived predictions. High-risk patients should be considered for aneurysm management in dedicated aortic centers, regardless of approach.
-
Comparative Study
Contemporary comparison of aortic arch repair by endovascular and open surgical reconstructions.
This study analyzed total aortic arch reconstruction in a contemporary comparison of current open and endovascular repair. ⋯ Despite the older age and a higher comorbidity profile in patients with challenging aortic arch disease suitable and selected for endovascular arch repair, no significant differences were detected in perioperative and 4-year outcomes compared with the younger patients undergoing open arch total repair. An endovascular approach might also be a valid alternative to open surgery in average-risk patients with aortic arch diseases requiring 0 to 1 landing zones, when morphologically feasible. However, larger concurrent comparison and longer follow-up are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Prospective, randomized, multi-institutional clinical trial of a silver alginate dressing to reduce lower extremity vascular surgery wound complications.
Wound complications negatively affect outcomes of lower extremity arterial reconstruction. By way of an investigator initiated clinical trial, we tested the hypothesis that a silver-eluting alginate topical surgical dressing would lower wound complication rates in patients undergoing open arterial procedures in the lower extremity. ⋯ The incidence of wound complications remains high in contemporary open lower extremity arterial surgery. Under the study conditions, a silver-eluting alginate dressing showed no effect on the incidence of wound complications.