Health policy
-
Comparative Study
Pakistan's maternal and child health policy: analysis, lessons and the way forward.
An estimated 400,000 infant and 16,500 maternal deaths occur annually in Pakistan. These translate into an infant mortality rate and maternal mortality ratio that should be unacceptable to any state. Disease states including communicable diseases and reproductive health (RH) problems, which are largely preventable account for over 50% of the disease burden. ⋯ The suggested strategic directions emphasize, among others, the need for a comprehensive MCH/FP framework; strengthened stewardship in ministry of health, cost-effective strategies to address the gaps identified and doubling of the public sector resource allocation to MCH/FP over the next 5 years. The ability to ensure delivery of quality health services remains the biggest challenge in the Pakistani health sector. Unless sound policies are backed by well-functioning programs they are likely to become a victim of poor implementation.
-
Shifting the burden of health care finance: a case study of public-private partnership in Singapore.
Since becoming independent in 1965, Singapore has attained high standards in health care provision while successfully transferring a substantial portion of the health care burden to the private sector. The government's share of total health care expenditure contracted from 50% in 1965 to 25% in 2000. At first glance, the efficiency-driven health care financing reforms which emphasize individual over state responsibility appear to have been implemented at the expense of equity. ⋯ In fact, access to needed care for the poor is explicitly guaranteed. Mechanisms also exist to protect against financial impoverishment resulting from catastrophic illness. Singapore's experience provides an interesting case study in public-private partnership, illustrating how a hard-headed approach to health policy can achieve national health goals while balancing efficiency and equity concerns.
-
In the wake of significant budget shortfalls, numerous states have increased cigarette excise taxes to boost revenues. This study examines whether or not increasing the price of cigarettes, which will occur as a consequence of cigarette excise tax increases, and implementing stronger restrictions on smoking in private worksites and other public places have an impact on smoking cessation decisions of young adults, thereby influencing public health in the United States (US). This paper employs longitudinal data on young adults from the Monitoring the Future Surveys matched with information on site-specific prices and measures of clean indoor air restrictions. ⋯ The average price elasticity of cessation is 0.35. In addition, stronger restrictions on smoking in private worksites and public places other than restaurants increase the probability of young adult smoking cessation. Given the well-documented benefits of smoking cessation, a significant increase in cigarette excises taxes may be one of the most effective means to reduce premature death and disease in the United States.
-
The '2-week rule', introduced in the UK during 1999, represents a significant organisational change for referral of patients with suspected breast cancer. From an analysis of policy documents, a mixture of influences and agendas from different interest groups are apparent in the current working of the policy. These include political/modernisation agendas with a variety of aims including: reducing variation in care, efficient administration, reassuring patients, improving public confidence, earlier referral and lowering the threshold for referral to improve mortality figures. ⋯ The agendas of these interest groups are in conflict and have implications for the future development of this particular policy. Similar considerations are likely to apply more widely to other controversial health policy developments. It may be of value to identify the agendas of the groups responsible for the introduction of such policies, as well as the agendas of groups with influence on how the policy is actually implemented, and assess the areas of conflict.
-
Day surgery has gained increasing significance in Norwegian health care during the 1990s, and now constitutes more than 50% of all elective surgery. Although the underlying general assumption is that this mode of delivering surgery will increase the efficiency of hospitals, most former studies have focused only on the cost-efficiency for specific types of surgical operations. The present study therefore uses data from Norwegian hospitals to test whether the proposition that day surgery spells efficiency also holds true at the hospital level. ⋯ The empirical model thus controls for several other important determinants of efficiency, such as hospital budget, the outpatient revenue share, irregularly long length of stay, hospital type and the share of emergency admissions. After accounting for these variables, our results document significant effects of day surgery on technical efficiency. The results furthermore show that the positive effect of day surgery is contingent upon hospital budget, as hospitals with large budgets experience stronger efficiency effects of day surgery.