European journal of anaesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Technical problems and side effects associated with continuous intrathecal or epidural post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.
Fifty-five patients undergoing hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia (4 ml of 0.5% plain bupivacaine) were randomized to receive post-operative analgesia either using an intrathecal or an epidural catheter. Associated technical problems and side effects were studied. In both groups per-operative analgesia was achieved with intrathecal 0.5% plain bupivacaine, 4 ml. ⋯ The number of side effects was 21 in the remaining spinal group (n = 20) and 18 in the 20 epidural group patients with successful infusions. One patient in the spinal catheter group developed postdural puncture headache. For post-operative pain relief the patients in the epidural group needed less supplementary intramuscular oxycodone (five doses/four patients) than the spinal group (17 doses/nine patients) (P < 0.05).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesia for outpatient surgery: placebo versus naproxen sodium (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) given before or after surgery.
One hundred and eighty patients scheduled for day-care surgery were allocated randomly to one of three groups to receive naproxen sodium 1100 mg 1 h prior to surgery, naproxen sodium 1100 mg immediately after surgery, or placebo. The pre-surgery naproxen sodium group had significantly lower pain scores 1 h post-operatively and at discharge than the placebo group. At discharge both treatment groups were better than placebo. ⋯ A questionnaire concerning general acceptability of anaesthesia/analgesia showed similar results. Our conclusion is that naproxen is better than placebo for treatment of post-operative pain. The time of administration pre- or post-operatively is important for the immediate post-operative pain, but we found no support for the existence of 'pre-emptive analgesia'.
-
Although it is generally acknowledged that a pre-use checkout of the anaesthetic machine significantly improves patient safety, an evaluation of such procedures is uncommon. Previous studies have shown that anaesthetic personnel using different check routines are unable to detect the majority of pre-set technical malfunctions. We have shown that it is possible to develop an effective and time-saving check procedure by integrating seven simple steps into one continuous flow procedure, where the settings and results of one step are used in the following step to optimize step interaction. ⋯ A performance test was undertaken by activating four different malfunctions in an anaesthetic machine training simulator. Twelve of 17 nurse anaesthetists rapidly identified all faults, whereas five nurses missed one or two faults. Our study suggests that our check procedure (the seven point check) provides a time-saving method for effective pre-use control of the anaesthetic machine.