European journal of anaesthesiology
-
Clinical Trial
Effects of hydroxyethyl starch on blood coagulation profile.
The effects of hydroxyethyl starch on blood coagulation were investigated in 20 patients undergoing surgery to determine whether its use places recipients at risk of haemorrhage or thrombosis. The partial thromboplastin times are significantly prolonged; factor VIII activities and fibrinogen levels are decreased. ⋯ A decreased platelet aggregation was also found after the infusion of hydroxyethyl starch. According to our results, hydroxyethyl starch can cause haemorrhagic problems in patients when administered as a colloidal volume-expanding agent.
-
In this study the effects of gamma-hydroxybutyrate/fentanyl on cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) (as measured in the middle cerebral artery by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography) and on cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity were investigated. Mean CBFV (Vmean) and haemodynamic responses were recorded in 12 non-neurosurgical patients before, during and after induction of general anaesthesia with gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) (20 min constant rate infusion of 100 mg kg-1). Two patients were excluded, one because of bradycardia and the other because of severe myoclonia. ⋯ After adjusting the ventilation to achieve hypocapnia (40 min: end-tidal PCO2 3.5 +/- 0.2 mmHg), Vmean decreased to 29 +/- 7 cm s-1, while MAP did not change. This allowed the relative vasoreactivity (percentage change in Vmean/0.133 kPa change in the end-tidal PCO2 from normocapnia to hypocapnia) to be estimated as 2.7 +/- 1.6% 0.133 kPa-1. This suggests that cerebrovascular response to CO2 during gamma-hydroxybutyrate/fentanyl anaesthesia is maintained.
-
The reduction in propofol-induced pain on injection caused by the addition of lignocaine results mainly from a drop in pH, which reduces the concentration of propofol in the aqueous phase of the emulsion. It is not an effect of the local anaesthetic per se. ⋯ These mixtures were stored for 3 months and compared with a freshly prepared solution of propofol 1% emulsion and saline, in the same proportion, regarding their ability to induce anaesthesia in the rat. There was no significant difference in the amount of propofol required to induce anaesthesia, nor was there any difference in recovery time between the three groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Analgesia for adenotonsillectomy in children and young adults: a comparison of tramadol, pethidine and nalbuphine.
A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was undertaken to compare the perioperative analgesic and recovery characteristics of equipotent doses of tramadol, pethidine and nalbuphine (3.0 mg kg-1, 1.5 mg kg-1 and 0.3 mg kg-1 respectively) with placebo (saline 0.02 ml kg-1) given at induction of anaesthesia in 152 ASA 1 children and young adults undergoing tonsillo-adenoidectomy. Premedication (temazepam and diclofenac), induction and maintenance of anaesthesia (thiopentone, atracurium, nitrous oxide and isoflurane), with controlled ventilation, were standardized. Variables monitored were heart rate (HR) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) during surgery, time to recovery of spontaneous respiration at the termination of anaesthesia and restlessness, time to awakening, sedation and emesis in the recovery unit. ⋯ Other recovery variables were similar, except that restlessness-pain scores were reduced by tramadol (P < 0.02), pethidine (P < 0.005) and nalbuphine (P < 0.005). These results suggest that pethidine 1.5 mg kg-1 and nalbuphine 0.3 mg kg-1 given with induction of anaesthesia provide better analgesia during and after tonsillo-adenoidectomy than does tramadol 3.0 mg kg-1. The delay to recovery of spontaneous respiration with pethidine suggests a greater safety profile of nalbuphine and tramadol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Tramadol or fentanyl analgesia for ambulatory knee arthroscopy.
In a double-blind, randomized, controlled study, 61 patients who received a standardized anaesthetic for day case arthroscopic knee surgery were studied. Group T (n = 31) received tramadol 1.5 mg kg-1, and group F (n = 30) received fentanyl 1.5 micrograms kg-1 at the induction of anaesthesia. All patients also received 20 mL of intra-articular bupivacaine 0.5% at the end of surgery. ⋯ There were no other significant differences between the groups in terms of pain scores, supplemental analgesic requirements or incidence of side-effects. We conclude that tramadol offers little benefit clinically compared with fentanyl when used at induction of anaesthesia for day case arthroscopic knee surgery. Further studies are indicated in patients with more severe pain to determine the role of tramadol in post-operative analgesia.