European journal of anaesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Epidural diamorphine infusions with and without 0.167% bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia.
Forty patients who underwent upper or mid-abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to receive a post-operative epidural infusion of 0.083 mg ml-1 of diamorphine in either 0.167% bupivacaine or 0.9% NaCl solution. The nursing staff, who were unaware of which solution was being infused, managed the patients' pain according to a standardized scheme. They adjusted the epidural infusion rates to 3, 5 or 7 ml h-1 according to the patient's hourly reports of pain on a four point verbal rating scale (none, mild, moderate or severe), aiming to use the lowest allowed infusion rate to prevent or reduce any pain that was more than mild. ⋯ Diclofenac was needed by six patients receiving diamorphine in saline and one receiving diamorphine in bupivacaine (P < 0.05). The range of average hourly epidural infusion rates was constrained by design to between 3 and 7 ml h-1 but the median of these values was 5 ml h-1 in the diamorphine-saline group and 3.35 ml h-1 in the diamorphine-bupivacaine group (P < 0.02). In patients receiving diamorphine in saline, a median of 6 (range 0-16) of the 24 h reports were of more than mild pain, whereas in the diamorphine-bupivacaine group, the corresponding figures were 2 (range 0-13) (P < 0.02)).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
The minimum and maximum sound pressure levels (Lmin, Lmax) were measured, and the energy equivalent sound pressure level (Leq) and the impulse rated Leq (LAlm) were ascertained in the surgical intensive care unit and the anaesthetic and recovery room. Frequency analyses were also made of the noise from various pieces of equipment. The LAlm was never below 60 dB(A)--the wake-up threshold in man--comprising strong narrow-band impulses with Lmax more than 100 dB(A) primarily from instrument alarms. ⋯ Whilst the maximum sound level of the technical equipment was high, it was surpassed by avoidable background noise caused by the staff (e.g. falling bucket lid: 94.7 dB(A)). No relationship was found between acoustic parameters and intended type of anaesthesia or surgery. Sound level was low in dangerous situations and high during routine work.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Epidural infusions of sufentanil with and without bupivacaine: comparison with diamorphine-bupivacaine.
The requirements for supplementary 3 ml epidural injections of bupivacaine 0.5% (top-ups) were used in a randomized double-blind study to compare the effects of five types of thoracic epidural infusions given at 2.5 ml h-1 for the first 24 h after major surgery to the upper abdomen in 99 patients and the lower abdomen in 72. The infusions were: bupivacaine 0.167% alone; diamorphine 0.167 mg ml-1 (0.417 mg h-1) in bupivacaine 0.167%; sufentanil 2 micrograms ml-1 (5 micrograms h-1) in 0.167% bupivacaine; sufentanil 4 micrograms ml-1 (10 micrograms h-1) in 0.167% bupivacaine; and sufentanil 4 micrograms ml-1 (10 micrograms h-1) in normal saline. The patients who had upper abdominal surgery were on average older than those having lower abdominal surgery and a larger proportion of them were female. ⋯ Although the two sufentanil-bupivacaine mixtures were indistinguishable in analgesic effectiveness after either upper or lower abdominal surgery, the lower (5 micrograms h-1) dose rate of sufentanil gave a significantly higher average breathing rate and lower average PaCO2 for the first 24 h after lower (but not upper) abdominal surgery. Blood samples were taken (as an afterthought) from 11 patients receiving sufentanil 10 micrograms h-1, just before the epidural infusion was stopped. The concentrations were mostly above the range for systemic analgesia, but below the values that would have been expected if a steady state had been achieved.
-
Comparative Study
Haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of CO2 with N2O insufflation.
We studied the haemodynamic effects of intra-abdominal insufflation with either CO2 (n = 15) or N2O (n = 15) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Haemodynamic variables were measured at increasing levels of intra-abdominal pressure up to 20 mmHg. In the CO2 group cardiac index decreased from 2.6 +/- 0.6 to 2.0 +/- 0.4 litre min-1 m-2 (mean +/- SD, P < 0.001) and in the N2O group from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.4 litre min-1 m-2 (P < 0.001)). ⋯ In both groups central venous O2 tension and saturation decreased at maximum intra-abdominal pressure and increased after release of the pneumoperitoneum. The results indicate that laparoscopic insufflation with either CO2 or N2O results in cardiovascular depression. Insufflation with N2O may decrease blood pressure, whereas mean arterial pressure is better preserved with CO2 insufflation.