European journal of anaesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
General anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for primary caesarean section--a comparative study.
Forty-seven healthy parturients undergoing elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated to either general anaesthesia (n = 24) or epidural anaesthesia (n = 23) under standardized anaesthetic and surgical conditions. Seven women of the epidural group required additional systemic analgesia or sedation following delivery of the neonate. Nine of 24 newborns obtained 1-min Apgar scores below 7 after general anaesthesia compared to only 3/23 after epidural anaesthesia. ⋯ Our investigation did not show either the incision-delivery interval or the start of operation-delivery interval to play a role in neonatal outcome. Epidural anaesthesia is superior to general anaesthesia in Caesarean section under normal conditions with regard to neonatal outcome. Whether this is also true for critical conditions cannot be concluded from this study.
-
The pharmacodynamics and -kinetics of pipecuronium were studied in 12 patients, six of whom received 100 micrograms kg-1 for laryngectomy (Group L), and six who underwent choledochotomy after insertion of the T-drain and were given 50 micrograms kg-1 (Group C). Onset time and clinical duration were 2.3 and 109 min and 2.8 and 39 min in Groups L and C, respectively. All patients could be sufficiently reversed with neostigmine. ⋯ Within 24 h, 38.6% and 37% were excreted unchanged in the urine and 4.4% and 1% as 3-desacetyl pipecuronium in Groups L and C, respectively. Within 24 h only 2% was excreted into the bile in Group C. Distribution volume and terminal half-life in Group C were positively correlated with pre-operative serum aminotransferase levels (P less than 0.005).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Thoracolumbar epidural anaesthesia and isoflurane to prevent hypertension and tachycardia in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.
Cardiovascular and hormonal responses to reconstructive abdominal aortic surgery were studied in 20 patients anaesthetized either with moderate-dose fentanyl (20 micrograms kg-1) combined with isoflurane, nitrous oxide and oxygen (n = 10), or with thoracolumbar epidural bupivacaine combined with isoflurane, nitrous oxide and oxygen (n = 10). After the start of operation, hypotension occurred in four patients in the epidural group. In both groups, the aortic cross-clamping caused slight increases both in mean arterial pressure and in calculated systemic vascular resistance, and a significant decrease in cardiac index. ⋯ At the same time, plasma vasopressin and adrenaline increased significantly in both groups, whereas plasma noradrenaline did so only in the fentanyl group. The results suggest that thoracolumbar epidural bupivacaine combined with low-dose isoflurane in nitrous-oxide-oxygen prevents intra-operative hypertension and tachycardia, but it may cause hypotension. Post-operative hypertension and tachycardia as well as the increase in plasma noradrenaline are prevented by epidural administration of bupivacaine-fentanyl.
-
Experiments using measurement of electrical-current threshold as a nociceptive test in the skin of the tail and neck in rats demonstrated that fentanyl, ketocyclazocine and midazolam caused spinally mediated antinociception when the drugs were administered intrathecally via chronically implanted lumbar subarachnoid catheters. The benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil selectively suppressed the midazolam response, indicating that this benzodiazepine exerted its segmental antinociceptive effect via spinal-cord benzodiazepine receptors. ⋯ The dose of naloxone which suppressed the midazolam response was similar to that required to suppress the response to the kappa-opioid agonist. We suggest that the segmental antinociceptive effects of fentanyl and midazolam are mediated via different pathways; the benzodiazepine exerts its antinociceptive action via a spinal-cord opioid pathway which does not involve mu-receptors.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol or etomidate.
In combination with fentanyl, propofol was compared with etomidate for total intravenous anaesthesia in 21 women (ASA Grades I-II) admitted for elective hysterectomy. They received either propofol (bolus 1.5 mg kg-1, infusion 9 mg kg-1 h-1 for 10 min thereafter 6 mg kg-1 h-1) or etomidate (bolus 0.10 mg kg-1, infusion 3 mg kg-1 h-1 reduced to 0.6 mg kg-1 h-1). Fentanyl 10 micrograms kg-1 was given for induction followed by an infusion of 30 micrograms kg-1 h-1 for 10 min reduced to 6 micrograms kg-1 h-1 for the first hour and successively reduced over time. ⋯ Nausea and vomiting were more pronounced in the etomidate group, and mental side-effects were only seen after etomidate. After 3 months, more patients in the etomidate group complained of reduced power of concentration. We conclude that total intravenous anaesthesia with either propofol or etomidate is equally easy to manage, but in the recovery situation propofol was advantageous in time and quality.