Family practice
-
A survey was conducted among family doctors to determine the frequency with which they were requested to administer euthanasia or assist in suicide, and how often they actually applied these procedures. Two random samples (in each n = 521) were taken from the population of Dutch family doctors (n = 6300) and requested to complete an anonymous questionnaire. The response was 67%. ⋯ An average of 40% of all requests are complied with. We conclude that far fewer family doctors are involved in euthanasia and assisted suicide than was previously supposed. Euthanasia or assisted suicide was administered to 1 in 25 persons who died in their own homes.
-
We conducted a survey among two random samples of Dutch doctors in order to determine whether they acted prudently with regard to euthanasia and assisted suicide. The doctors completed an anonymous questionnaire and those who at one time or another had applied euthanasia or assisted suicide (52%) were asked about several aspects of the requirements for prudent practice. 'Pointless suffering' was the most important and most common reason for requesting euthanasia or assisted suicide; 'pain' was rarely the most important reason. ⋯ A total of 12% of the doctors had applied euthanasia or assisted suicide without having had any kind of consultation or discussion with a colleague, a nurse or any other health care professional; 26% had not issued a certificate testifying to death from natural causes. We conclude that some of the family doctors do not observe the procedural requirements, but that the majority satisfies the material requirements for prudent practice.
-
A controlled single subject trial compares the efficacy of a new treatment with a control treatment in an individual patient. The treatments are administered in a double-blind, randomized, multi-crossover sequence of periods. During the trial response measures are obtained from each treatment period and form the basis for the statistical evaluation. ⋯ Accordingly, less rigorous statistical requirements and power must be accepted. The consequence is an increased risk of both Type I and II errors. However, in comparison with the trial and error approach frequently applied in clinical practice, the controlled single subject trial may improve the certainty of therapeutic decisions in the individual patient.
-
Advocacy of communication skills training in medical curricula is common, but this paper highlights some paradoxes which become apparent when such training is instituted. Fourth-year medical students completed a standardized questionnaire measure of empathy, before and after intensive training in counselling and communication in general practice. Low rates of empathetic responding were shown, and no increase occurred after training. The results are discussed in terms of an emerging dilemma within medical education and practice, namely the conflict between the traditional view of the doctor as problem-solver and recent evidence of the health benefits of a more patient-centred style of medical practice.
-
The cost of a consultation with a general practitioner forms an integral part of many economic evaluations. If resources are to be allocated efficiently it is necessary to provide accurate costings. Despite this, the research literature lacks any established method for costing consultations. This paper reviews some of the approaches used in previous studies, considers some of the issues involved in costing consultations, and provides some guidelines to follow when costing general practitioner consultations.