Der Unfallchirurg
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Primary external fixation with consecutive procedural modification in polytrauma].
It is the purpose of the current investigation to determine whether immediate external fixation of fractures, which is a simple and fast procedure, followed by secondary planned conversion represents a safe and reliable procedure without additional trauma in multiply injured patients (ISS > 15). ⋯ Immediate external fixation in multiply injured patients is fast and poor of complications. It is a expedient procedure which is safe and careful for critically ill patients. The required conversion procedure shows no raised rate of complications.
-
For operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures minimal invasive techniques reduce the risk of iatrogenic damage of blood supply and periarticular scarring. Reported preliminary results are encouraging. We present our experience achieved with an intramedullary wire fixation adapted from a report of Kapandji in 1989. ⋯ We observed no secondary fragment displacement or non-unions. In our hands, this technique offers good results, even in valgus-impacted 4-part fractures of the elderly and allows internal fixation in little displaced but unstable fractures with the benefit of early functional treatment instead of longer immobilization. Based on the experience with intramedullary wiring the previously performed technique using threading wires was abandoned and the indication for primary arthroplasty considerably influenced.
-
Computer assisted navigation-based surgery is a novel and interesting challenge for todays surgeons. One must however keep in mind, that the indications for these techniques (a) should be carefully considered, (b) used only if morbidity is not increased and (c) when previously problematic or inacurate surgical methods can be improved upon. ⋯ Percutaneous retrograde drilling (cf. [6, 7, 9, 15, 20, 21]) spared the joint's cartilage in all cases. At the level of the knee joint we see the usefulness of this method for complex situations (cf. [12, 13]) requiring precise drilling.
-
Comparative Study
[Treatment outcome after surgical management of osseous breast carcinoma metastases. Preventive stabilization vs. management after pathological fracture].
AIM OF THE STUDY, METHOD: The advantages of a prophylactic care of fracture-endangered, osseous metastasis of the mammary cancer stand opposite to the perioperative risk and to conservative alternatives. As a pathologic fracture cannot surely be excluded while performing a conservative proceeding, a retrospective trial was set up to compare the results of treatment after a pathologic fracture (n = 35) with those undergoing a prophylactic attendance (n = 44). ⋯ The prophylactic treatment of fracture endangered, osseous metastasis of the mammary cancer leads to reduction of the general, postoperative complications compared to the patients with a pathologic fracture. Further, those patients have a better chance to recover full mobility after surgery. Considering the long survival time after the incidence of osseous metastasis at the mammary cancer a prophylactic treatment represents the method of first choice compared with the conservative treatment which persistently contains the risk of fracturing.
-
We present a case of cardiac infarction after blunt chest trauma. The 49-year-old patient suffered from severe angina and the ECG demonstrated a pattern of acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. ⋯ An attempted revascularization by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty failed and the patient was then submitted to bypass surgery. We conclude that possible heart injury should be considered in patients with blunt chest trauma to lead them to adequate therapy.