Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Feb 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA double-blind comparison of epidural bupivacaine and bupivacaine-fentanyl for caesarean section.
The effect of adding fentanyl 100 mcg to bupivacaine 0.5% plain to establish epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section was investigated in a randomised, double-blind study of sixty healthy women. The quality of intraoperative analgesia as assessed by both patients and anaesthetists was significantly improved with fentanyl. The onset and duration of sensory anaesthesia, degree and duration of motor block, and other characteristics of epidural anaesthesia were unaltered. ⋯ The pharmacokinetics of epidural fentanyl administration were investigated by plasma fentanyl assays from maternal and cord blood taken at delivery. Epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl combination is a valuable therapeutic approach to the conduct of epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section in healthy women and foetuses. Further neonatal evaluation of the premature or compromised foetus is suggested before the universal application of this technique.
-
The relation between plasma concentration and the effects of atracurium was studied in seven patients anaesthetised with thiopentone, fentanyl and nitrous oxide-oxygen. The response to train-of-four stimulation at ten-second intervals with tetanic stimuli applied every five minutes were recorded. The first sign of transmission returning after complete blockade was usually the post-tetanic facilitated twitch, which was noted when the mean atracurium concentration was 1.15 mg 1(-1) (SD 0.77). ⋯ Once recovery commenced, these four parameters recovered at similar rates, with recovery indices (25 to 75% responses) of 14.8 (SD 1.7), 14.0 (SD 1.0), 14.3 (SD 1.8) and 13.7 (SD 2.1) minutes respectively. Post-tetanic facilitation was most marked during severe but incomplete blockade and tetanic stimulation temporarily reversed the atracurium-induced decrease in train-of-four ratio. Clinically, the use of tetanic stimulation did not improve the sensitivity of neuromuscular monitoring, but post-tetanic count may be useful where monitoring of profound relaxation is required.