Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jun 1998
Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography: impact on adult cardiac surgery.
Although multiple case reports have demonstrated the capability of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) to detect unsuspected cardiac pathology with important therapeutic implications, few studies have examined the effect of real-time interpretation of routine TOE on clinical management of a typical series of cardiac surgery patients. To assess the impact of intraoperative TOE on cardiac surgical management, we conducted a prospective observational study on 238 consecutive patients undergoing intraoperative TOE during adult cardiac surgery. Potentially important new diagnostic information was detected in 39 of 184 (21%) routine and in 53 of 54 requested TOE examinations, and led directly to different surgical procedures in 11 of 184 (6%) routine and in 12 of 54 (22%) requested TOE examinations. Our data suggests that intraoperative TOE may be a valuable tool in the routine management of adult cardiac surgical patients.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jun 1998
Australian Incident Monitoring Study in intensive care: local unit review meetings and report management.
The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in the intensive care unit (AIMS-ICU) is a national study established through nursing and medical collaboration to develop, introduce and evaluate an anonymous voluntary incident reporting system. To ensure incident monitoring results in improved patient safety, it is essential that reported incidents are followed up regularly. Local unit review meetings are an effective forum for discussion and review of reports amongst a wide group of practitioners from the intensive care unit (ICU). ⋯ Ongoing momentum of the project is assisted by highlighting its positive contributions to patient care and safety via newsletters, poster displays and targeted correspondence. New staff require orientation to the reporting system and assurance regarding safety of data. The emphasis must focus on the system, not the individual.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jun 1998
Clinical TrialPotential intrathecal leakage of solutions injected into the epidural space following combined spinal epidural anaesthesia.
A combined spinal epidural anaesthetic (CSE), by design, produces a deliberate multicompartment block across a breached dural membrane. Since the lateral holes of the epidural catheter may lie in close proximity to the dural puncture site, a bolus solution of drug injected via the epidural catheter has the potential to leak through the dural puncture into the subarachnoid space. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of intrathecal leak by performing an epidurogram. ⋯ All films were later reviewed for evidence of intrathecal spread. We did not observe any evidence of intrathecal spread of contrast. However, caution should be observed during administration of an intraoperative bolus dose of analgesic agent via a catheter inserted as part of a combined spinal epidural anaesthetic technique, particularly with the use of hydrophilic opiods.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Apr 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPatient evaluation and comparison of the recovery profile between propofol and thiopentone as induction agents in day surgery.
The patient's subjective perception of the quality of his/her recovery after day case anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone as induction agents is still controversial. The authors investigated the perception and quality of awakening after anaesthesia during the recovery period and at 24 hours and 72 hours, in outpatients undergoing anaesthesia induced either with propofol or thiopentone and maintained with a volatile anaesthetic. In a double-blind study in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy in a day surgery unit, propofol and thiopentone were compared as induction agents in 60 randomized outpatients. ⋯ In the propofol group, patients awoke more rapidly (9.2 +/- 5.8 vs 12.3 +/- 5.8 min) (P < 0.05); however, the CFFT measurements did not show any significant difference between the groups, except at time = 0 min, when 17 patients in the propofol group were able to perform the test versus only 10 patients in the thiopentone group (P < 0.05). At 4, 24, and 72 hours postoperatively, the authors were unable to detect any difference between the two groups. Except for early recovery, there were no differences between the intermediate and late recovery profiles, when propofol or thiopentone was used as the anaesthetic induction agent in day surgery.