Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialOndansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting following minor oral surgery: a double-blind randomized study.
The efficacy and safety of ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting following minor oral surgery was evaluated in a prospective randomized double-blind study. Of a total of seventy-seven patients, randomly 38 had 4 mg of ondansetron and 39 had normal saline as placebo intravenously immediately prior to induction of anaesthesia. A standard general anaesthetic with thiopentone, suxamethonium, fentanyl, nitrous oxide and isoflurane was employed. ⋯ Patients who vomited twice or more and the number who required a rescue antiemetic were significantly fewer in the ondansetron group (P < 0.05). Cardiovascular parameters were stable and showed no significant difference in the two groups. There were no significant adverse effects that could be directly attributable to ondansetron.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA double-blind comparison of vecuronium administered by the Springfusor infusion device to vecuronium by intermittent bolus injection in critically ill adult patients.
To evaluate the Springfusor infusion device for clinical use in an Intensive Care Unit and to compare the technique of intermittent bolus and constant infusion of muscle relaxants, we undertook a prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. Twenty critically ill ventilated patients requiring muscle paralysis were investigated. ⋯ The device is robust, easy to use and reduces nursing workload. This may translate into cost-saving improvement in patient care if the Springfusor is used to provide muscle relaxation, sedation and analgesia.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPatient-controlled analgesia: a comparison with nurse-controlled intravenous opioid infusions.
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous pethidine was compared with nurse-controlled pethidine infusions for pain relief in 200 patients after major abdominal or thoracic surgery. Pain, level of sedation, nausea and presence of other adverse effects, in addition to cumulative pethidine requirement, were measured for the first 24 hours after surgery. Both groups were similar for age, weight and type of surgery. ⋯ The frequency and severity of adverse effects was also similar. The cumulative pethidine dose administered to both groups was identical. It is concluded that nurse-controlled opioid infusions are as effective as PCA and may be used as an alternative to PCA where this is either unavailable or unsuitable.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of three induction agents in paediatric anaesthesia--cardiovascular effects and recovery.
We studied 30 children undergoing circumcision randomly allocated to receive either thiopentone 4 mg.kg-1, propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 or midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 (n = 10) IV over 30 seconds at induction of anaesthesia. Blood pressure and pulse rate during the first 15 minutes of induction were recorded by a Finapres 2300e and a Cardiocap CM-104, and changes from preinduction baseline compared between the three induction agents and the two recording instruments. Postoperatively, blood levels of the induction agents were measured and recovery from anaesthesia was assessed by clinical criteria, mood and sedation scores and psychomotor performance. ⋯ Drug blood levels correlated weakly with both methods of psychomotor assessment (r > or = 0.6). Of the three induction agents, thiopentone caused the least haemodynamic perturbation on induction, and anaesthesia induced with midazolam caused the greatest psychomotor impairment on awakening. Within one hour patients in all drug groups were equally awake, co-operative and co-ordinated.