Pediatric emergency care
-
Pediatric emergency care · Aug 2023
Observational StudyThe Impact of an Emergency Department Bruising Pathway on Disparities in Child Abuse Evaluation.
Previous research has shown racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in provider medical evaluations and reporting to child protective services (CPS) and law enforcement (LE) for cases of suspected child physical abuse. Our hospital standardized evaluation and reporting of high-risk bruising using a clinical pathway. We aimed to assess whether standardization impacted disparity. ⋯ A standardized clinical pathway for identification and evaluation of high-risk bruising may help to decrease socioeconomic disparities in reporting high-risk bruising. Larger studies are needed to fully evaluate disparities in assessment and reporting of child abuse.
-
Pediatric emergency care · Aug 2023
Observational StudyPoint-of-Care Noninvasive Technology for Pediatric Dehydration Assessment.
Dehydration is a commonly encountered problem worldwide. Current clinical assessment is limited by subjectivity and limited provider training with children. The objective of this study is to investigate a new noninvasive, point-of-care technology that measures capillary refill combined with patient factors to accurately diagnose dehydration. ⋯ The digital capillary refill point-of-care device combined with readily available patient-specific factors may improve the ability to detect pediatric dehydration and facilitate earlier treatment or transfer to higher levels of care.
-
Pediatric emergency care · Aug 2023
Predictors of Delayed Diagnosis of Pediatric CNS Tumors in the Emergency Department.
Central nervous system (CNS) tumor diagnoses are frequently delayed in children, which may lead to adverse outcomes and undue burdens on families. Examination of factors associated with delayed emergency department (ED) diagnosis could identify approaches to reduce delays. ⋯ Delayed ED diagnosis of pediatric CNS tumors is common and frequently requires multiple ED encounters. Prevention of delays should focus on careful evaluation of young or chronically ill children, mitigating disparities for Black and publicly insured children, and improving pediatric readiness in rural and nonteaching EDs.
-
Pediatric emergency care · Aug 2023
Pediatric Septic Shock Care Pathways in General Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study Targeting How to Really Make it Work.
Many academic pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) have successfully implemented pediatric septic shock care pathways. However, many general emergency departments (GEDs), who see the majority of pediatric ED visits, have not. This study aims to compare the workflow, resources, communication, and decision making across these 2 settings to inform the future implementation of a standardized care pathway for children with septic shock in the GED. ⋯ Pediatric septic shock workflow, decision making, and system performance differ between the PED and GEDs. Implementation of a standardized care pathway in GEDs will require a tailored approach. Specific recommendations include (1) improving shared situation awareness; (2) simulation for knowledge, skill, and team-based training; and (3) promoting a culture of continuous learning.
-
The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the introduction of an education program familiarizing staff with the effective and appropriate use of Laceraine application to children's lacerations requiring repair at The Prince Charles Hospital Children's Emergency Department (TPCH-CED), Brisbane. ⋯ There was a significant change in practice with greater use of topical anesthetic (Laceraine) for the management of laceration repair of children, as expected, after the focused education program on its correct use. As emergency departments continue to be overwhelmed with increasing attendances and long patient wait times, a simple small intervention, such as that described, has potential to improve flow through the children's emergency department. Future research should focus on a randomized control trial to determine the contribution of the use of a topical agent, as opposed to injectable local anesthetic and/or full procedural sedation to determine the contribution to the impact of this simple change of practice on patient flow and satisfaction.