The Journal of international medical research
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Comparative study of ketorolac and paracetamol/codeine in alleviating pain following gynaecological surgery.
In a randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose, parallel study of 107 patients, the safety and analgesic efficacy of single and multiple doses of orally administered ketorolac tromethamine (10-40 mg/day) were compared with orally administered paracetamol (1000-4000 mg/day)/codeine (60-240 mg/day) for treating moderate to severe pain after gynaecological surgery. Both drugs effectively reduced pain intensity. After the first dose of medication, over 90% of the patients in each treatment group reported pain reduction of at least 50%. ⋯ No statistically significant differences in analgesic efficacy were observed in the two treatment groups. Ketorolac tromethamine-treated patients reported a total of 62 adverse events (17 considered drug-related) and the paracetamol/codeine-treated patients reported 65 (20 considered drug-related); the adverse event profiles of the two treatment regimens were similar. Thus, both the single and the multiple doses of ketorolac tromethamine (10 mg) alleviated moderate to severe pain after gynaecological surgery as safely and efficaciously as paracetamol (1000 mg)/codeine (60 mg).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Analgesic activity of flupirtine maleate: a controlled double-blind study with diclofenac sodium in orthopaedics.
A controlled, parallel group study of the analgesic efficacy of flupirtine maleate, was compared against diclofenac sodium in 40 orthopaedic patients with post-operative pain. Clinically, both drugs were of equal analgesic efficacy. A mathematical model has been developed, however, to evaluate the speed, intensity and duration of the analgesic effect and provides data which significantly favour flupirtine maleate in the treatment of these patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesic effect of aspirin, mefenamic acid and their combination in post-operative oral surgery pain.
A double-blind randomized single dose study of the analgesic effects of 650 mg aspirin, 250 mg mefenamic acid, the combination of 650 mg aspirin and 250 mg mefenamic acid and placebo on 120 patients with pain following oral surgery was conducted. Patients evaluated their pain intensity and extent of pain relief at 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after drug administration. For most parameters, including the sum of the pain intensity differences and the sum of the hourly pain relief scores, each of the drugs was more effective than placebo. Aspirin-mefenamic acid in combination was more effective than both drugs alone, and aspirin and mefenamic acid alone were equally effective for most of the analgesic variables.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Analgesic efficacy and side-effect profile of paracetamol/codeine and paracetamol/dextropropoxyphene after surgical removal of a lower wisdom tooth.
A double-blind randomized analgesic trial was carried out on 180 patients undergoing surgical removal of an impacted lower wisdom tooth. The patients took their first dose of either 1000 mg paracetamol plus 60 mg codeine or 650 mg paracetamol plus 65 mg dextropropoxyphene when pain appeared after the decline of the local anaesthesia. If needed, another two doses were available during the observation period (less than or equal to 10 h). ⋯ Sufficient pain relief was obtained in most patients. The pain reduction after the first dose was 64% in the group receiving paracetamol/codeine compared with 53% in the group receiving paracetamol/dextropropoxyphene and the mean durations of effect of the first dose were 6.6 and 5.8 h, respectively. Side-effects appeared in all patient groups but were most frequent in women taking paracetamol/codeine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Comparison of a modified hydrocortisone/urea cream and betamethasone valerate cream in the treatment of dry eczema.
A half-sided, single-blind, comparative study of a new modified formulation of 1% hydrocortisone/10% urea and 0.1% betamethasone valerate cream in the treatment of dry eczema showed that the two products were equally effective at the end of 1, 2 and 3 weeks of treatment in terms of efficacy and speed of action. No statistically significant differences could be detected between either preparation in any of the trial's measures (i.e. overall severity score, dryness/scaling, erythema, papules, itching, excoriation or lichenification) at any of the weekly assessments. The incidence of side-effects was the same with both treatments and patients' preference was equally divided between the two creams.