Journal of general internal medicine
-
Protocols concerning orders not to resuscitate have come into existence recently in order to facilitate decisions regarding resuscitation and to ensure that patient's rights to participate in such decisions are preserved. Prior to the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision is the decision whether to discuss the issue of resuscitation with the patient at all. ⋯ They found that the issue was discussed with only 10.8% of patients or their families on admission of the patients to these units. Such discussions occurred more frequently with older patients, those who were more severely ill or were estimated to have worse prognoses, those with poor intellectual function, and those admitted to the MICU rather than the CCU.
-
To determine the degree and sources of variability faculty evaluations of residents for the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Clinical Evaluation Exercise (CEX). ⋯ Faculty internists vary markedly in their observations of a resident and document little. To be useful for resident feedback and evaluation, exercises such as the CEX may need to use more specific and detailed forms to document strengths and weaknesses, and faculty evaluators probably need to be trained as observers.
-
Diabetic patients are traditionally taught to discard plastic syringe/needle units after a single use and to employ aseptic technique for administering insulin injections. We surveyed 87 diabetic outpatients for compliance with aseptic recommendations. We then studied prospectively the effects of reusing disposable syringes in 56 diabetic patients who reused syringes a mean of 6.6 times for 8.3 months and an aggregate of 23,664 injections. ⋯ Compliance with standard aseptic precautions was poor, with only 29% of patients following recommended practices. No adverse effect of syringe reuse was identified. The authors conclude that diabetic patients frequently reuse disposable syringes, without apparent harmful effect.
-
Comparative Study
Recognition of depression by internists in primary care: a comparison of internist and "gold standard" psychiatric assessments.
In an effort to elucidate the process of internists' recognition of depression in primary care settings, a comparison of internist and "gold standard" psychiatric assessments of patients was undertaken in a rural primary care practice over a 15-month period. Clinical characteristics and diagnoses, global assessments of psychosocial stress, and two aspects of chief-complaint presentation style, clarity and somatization, were recorded by the internists for each patient, who was independently assessed by a psychiatrist for the presence of any specific depressive disorder by structured interview. Internists correctly labeled 57% of the interview-assessed depressives as depressed; 13% of patients with "no psychiatric disorder" were assessed as depressed by internists. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the "false-negative" and "false-positive" internists' diagnoses were examined to clarify how internists think of "depression" in the primary care context.
-
All employees hired over a six-month period at a large hospital underwent pre-employment urinary toxicology screening. Results of the screening were kept confidential. After a year of employment, the personnel folders of all employees studied were reviewed. ⋯ There was a strongly significant difference between clerical and professional employees on each of these variables. This study did not find a relation between drug use and job performance. The widespread use of drug screening prior to employment makes further studies of this issue important.