Current medical research and opinion
-
Objective: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), a common cardiac arrhythmia, is associated with high morbidity and carries a substantial economic burden. Historically, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; e.g. warfarin) have been used for therapy of NVAF, but recently several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for prevention of stroke in patients with NVAF. This review summarizes the real-world evidence (RWE) for healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients receiving oral anticoagulants (VKAs and/or DOACs) for therapy of NVAF. ⋯ Bleed-related mortality in patients receiving oral anticoagulation for treatment of NVAF were low across all DOACs and warfarin. Conclusions: The limited available evidence for HRU burden among patients receiving oral anticoagulation for NVAF suggests that DOACs (particularly apixaban and dabigatran) offer some degree of benefit in terms of HRU outcomes, compared with warfarin. Further work is required to understand HRU outcomes in patients receiving DOACs.
-
Multicenter Study
Long-term treatment with plecanatide was safe and tolerable in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.
Objective: This open-label, multi-center, fixed-dose study (NCT02706483) evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of plecanatide for the treatment of adults with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). Methods: Safety and tolerability of once-daily plecanatide 6 mg for up to 53 weeks was assessed in patients with IBS-C who either had been enrolled in one of the phase 3 studies or were study-naïve but met eligibility criteria of the double-blind studies. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). ⋯ Conclusions: Plecanatide 6 mg was safe and well tolerated in patients with IBS-C treated for up to 53 weeks, with an overall safety profile similar to the 12-week IBS-C studies. Patients reported high rates of relief and satisfaction with treatment, and interest in continuing therapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02706483.
-
Objective: To systematically assess benefits and harm of non-pharmacologic interventions for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) symptoms. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1966 to May 24, 2016 for randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers evaluated studies for eligibility, serially abstracted data, evaluated risk of bias, and graded strength of evidence (SOE) for critical outcomes (pain and quality-of-life). ⋯ Conclusions: Alpha-lipoic acid and spinal cord stimulation were effective for pain; studies were short-term with quality deficits. Spinal cord stimulation had serious adverse events. Further research should address long-term outcomes and other non-pharmacologic treatments.
-
Objective: To compare rehospitalizations in patients with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) vs oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs), with a focus on young adults (18-35 years). Methods: The Premier Healthcare database (January 2009-December 2016) was used to identify hospitalizations of adults (≥18 years) with schizophrenia treated with PP1M or OAA between September 2009 and October 2016 (index hospitalizations). Rehospitalizations were assessed at 30, 60, and 90 days after each index hospitalization in young adults and in all patients. ⋯ Similarly, when observing all patients, those receiving PP1M during an index hospitalization had 19-22% lower odds of rehospitalization within 30, 60, and 90 days compared to those receiving OAAs (all p < .001). Conclusions: Following a hospitalization for schizophrenia, PP1M treatment was associated with fewer 90-day rehospitalizations among young adults (18-35 years) relative to OAA treatment. This finding was also observed in other hospitalized adults with schizophrenia.
-
Background: Denosumab is a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody that, neutralizing the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL), inhibits the osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. It is yet to be defined if denosumab can reduce osteoporosis-related disability and improve health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in patients with fragility fractures. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of denosumab in reducing back pain related disability and improving HRQoL in osteoporotic post-menopausal women with vertebral fractures. ⋯ Moreover, there was a significant improvement of both LS BMD (p < 0.001) and FN BMD (p < 0.001). No local or systemic adverse events, including new vertebral fractures, osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures, were reported. Conclusions: The data demonstrated that denosumab was effective in reducing back pain related disability and in improving HRQoL in post-menopausal women with vertebral fractures.