Current medical research and opinion
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Efficacy and safety of coenzyme A versus fenofibrate in patients with hyperlipidemia: a multicenter, double-blind, double-mimic, randomized clinical trial.
Background: We investigated the lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of coenzyme A (CoA) versus fenofibrate in Chinese patients with moderate dyslipidemia. Methods: A total of 417 subjects (aged 18-75 years) diagnosed with moderate dyslipidemia (triglyceride 2.3-6.5 mmol/L) from 13 large cardiovascular centers in China were recruited and randomly divided into a fenofibrate group (n = 207), which received 200 mg of fenofibrate orally once daily, and a CoA group (n = 210), which received 400 mg of CoA orally once a day. Blood lipoproteins, liver and renal function, creatine kinase, and blood glucose were measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. ⋯ The incidence of side effects was significantly lower in the CoA group compared with the fenofibrate group (p < .05). Conclusions: Compared with fenofibrate, CoA has less effect on reducing plasma TG levels in subjects with moderate dyslipidemia. However, it has fewer adverse effects.
-
Objective: This paper presents and discusses recent evidence on the pathophysiological mechanisms of pain. The role of tapentadol - an opioid characterized by an innovative mechanism of action (i.e. µ-opioid receptor [MOR] agonism and inhibition of noradrenaline [NA] reuptake [NRI]) - in the modulation of pain, and the most recent pharmacological evidence on this molecule (e.g. the µ-load concept) are also presented and commented upon. Methods: Narrative review. ⋯ Of note, the reduced µ-load of tapentadol limits the risk of opioid-related adverse events, such as gastrointestinal disturbances. Moreover, the NA component becomes predominant, at least, in some types of pain, with consequent specific clinical efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic and chronic pain. Conclusions: According to these characteristics, tapentadol appears suitable in the treatment of severe uncontrolled chronic pain characterized by both a nociceptive and a neuropathic component, such as osteoarthritis or back pain.
-
Multicenter Study
Long-term treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with macitentan in Japanese patients.
Objective: Macitentan, a novel dual endothelin receptor antagonist, was approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in Japan. However, long-term effects in Japanese patients of macitentan are currently unavailable. This study sought to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of macitentan in Japanese patients with PAH. ⋯ Levels of liver enzyme and hemoglobin remained unchanged throughout the study period. Conclusions: This study suggests that the long-term use of macitentan is well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with PAH. We concluded that macitentan can be a possible approach to reduce morbidity/mortality in Japanese PAH patients.
-
Objective: Clinical guidelines for the treatment of septic shock are based on the studies with the best scientific evidence, which are meta-analyses of clinical trials. However, these meta-analyses may have methodological limitations that prevent their conclusions from being extrapolated to routine clinical practice. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the quality of these meta-analyses through a systematic review. ⋯ Most elements of the OQAQ were conducted satisfactorily, although 35.3% of meta-analyses did not use a quality assessment of the studies included in other analyses. In 52.9% of meta-analyses, the quality of the studies was high or very high. Conclusions: The methods used to obtain the results should be taken into account when recommending an intervention to treat septic shock if the evidence comes from a meta-analysis of the analyzed characteristics.
-
Objective: This economic evaluation aims to provide a preliminary assessment of the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared with argon plasma coagulation (APC) when used to treat APC-refractory gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in symptomatic patients. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to undertake a cost-utility analysis for adults with persistent symptoms secondary to GAVE refractory to first line endoscopic therapy. The economic evaluation was conducted from a UK NHS and personal social services (PSS) perspective, with a 20-year time horizon, comparing RFA with APC. ⋯ The model estimated that implementing RFA would result in reductions in the need for intravenous iron, endoscopic intervention and requirement for blood transfusions by 27.1%, 32.3% and 36.5% respectively. Compared to APC, RFA was associated with an estimated 36.7% fewer procedures. Conclusions: RFA treatment is likely to be cost-effective for patients with ongoing symptoms following failure of first line therapy with APC and could lead to substantive reductions in health care resource.