Current medical research and opinion
-
We examined patient and treating physician (general practitioners, urologists, and [uro]gynecologists) preferences for oral pharmacotherapy (antimuscarinics and beta-3 adrenoceptor agonists) for overactive bladder to gain a deeper understanding of which attributes drive their treatment decision-making and to quantify to what extent. ⋯ A total of 442 patient and 318 physician responses were analyzed. Patients ranked the attributes based on their largest potential impact on treatment value as follows: incontinence, nocturia, risk of an increased heart rate, urgency, frequency, risk of increased blood pressure, risk of constipation, and risk of dry mouth; and physicians as follows: incontinence, urgency, nocturia, frequency, risk of dry mouth, coping, risk of increased heart rate, risk of increased blood pressure, risk of atrial fibrillation, and risk of constipation. CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONS: In their valuations, physicians put more emphasis on increasing benefits, whereas patients put more emphasis on limiting risks of side effects. Another contrast that emerged was that patients' valuations of side effects were found to be fairly insensitive to the presented risk levels (with the exception of risk of dry mouth), whereas physicians' evaluated all side effects in a risk-level dependent manner. The obtained utility functions can be used to predict whether, to what extent, and for which reasons patients and physicians would choose one oral pharmacotherapy over another, as well as to advance shared decision-making.
-
To examine the long-term persistence and safety of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran (D), rivaroxaban (R) and apixaban (A) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) treated in the framework of a well structured, nurse-based AF unit for initiation and follow-up of NOAC. ⋯ In a retrospective study at a single AF clinic, NOACs showed significantly different bleeding rates and varied discontinuation rates when compared to each other, related mainly to agent-specific side effects and bleedings. The majority of patients that discontinued proceeded with other types of oral anticoagulant.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Efficacy of single-dose, extended-release naproxen sodium 660 mg in postsurgical dental pain: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
To evaluate the efficacy of a novel formulation of extended-release/immediate-release (ER) naproxen sodium over 24 h in a dental pain model. ⋯ A single dose of ER naproxen sodium 660 mg significantly reduced moderate to severe dental pain vs. placebo and was comparable to IR naproxen sodium 220 mg tid. Significant pain relief was experienced from 15 min and sustained over 24 h, resulting in a reduced need for rescue medication. ER naproxen sodium 660 mg once daily is a convenient and effective therapy providing 24 h relief of pain.
-
Patiromer FOS (for oral suspension), formerly known as RLY5016, is pending FDA approval for the treatment of hyperkalemia. Once approved, patiromer, as well as a second agent known as sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9), will be among the new therapeutic options available to treat hyperkalemia in over 50 years. ⋯ Patiromer is effective in decreasing serum potassium, preventing recurrence of hyperkalemia, and reducing RAASi discontinuation. Compared to current SPS therapy, patiromer may be the preferred option to treat hyperkalemia, once approved. Patiromer is well tolerated and is not associated with serious AEs.