Journal of critical care
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2019
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative StudyAnalgesia-first sedation in critically ill adults: A U.S. pilot, randomized controlled trial.
To determine the feasibility of conducting a multicenter ICU RCT of AFS compared to either protocol-directed sedation (PDS) or both PDS and daily sedation interruption (DSI) in North America. ⋯ A multicenter RCT evaluating AFS is feasible to conduct in North America.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2019
Multicenter StudyCurrent practice and perceptions regarding pain, agitation and delirium management in patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
To characterize monitoring of pain, agitation, and delirium; investigate opioid and sedative choices; and describe prevention and treatment of delirium in adults receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) for respiratory failure. ⋯ Most respondents use validated scales and protocols to assess and manage pain, agitation/sedation, and delirium. The majority of respondents reported targeting a deep level of sedation with propofol being used for both deep and light levels of sedation.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2019
Multicenter StudyImpact of triage-to-admission time on patient outcome in European intensive care units: A prospective, multi-national study.
Ubiquitous bed shortages lead to delays in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions worldwide. Assessing the impact of delayed admission must account for illness severity. This study examined both the relationship between triage-to-admission time and 28-day mortality and the impact of controlling for Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II scores on that relationship. ⋯ Even after accounting for quantifiable parameters of illness severity, delayed admission did not negatively impact outcome. Triage practices likely influence outcomes. Severity scores may not fully reflect illness acuity or trajectory.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2019
Multicenter Study Observational StudyImpact of timing to source control in patients with septic shock: A prospective multi-center observational study.
Current guidelines recommend that rapid source control should be adopted in patients not >6-12 h after sepsis is diagnosed. However, evidence level of this guideline is not specified, and there is no previous study on patients with septic shock visiting the emergency department (ED). Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of rapid source control in patients with septic shock visiting the ED. ⋯ Patients with septic shock visiting the ED who underwent source control showed better outcomes than those who did not. We failed to demonstrate the performance of rapid source control reduced the 28-day mortality in septic shock patients. Further studies are required to determine the impact of rapid source control in sepsis and septic shock.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2019
Multicenter StudyQuality of life assessment following amputation for septic shock: a long-term descriptive survey after symmetric peripheral gangrene.
To assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following rehabilitation of amputees suffering symmetric peripheral gangrene (SPG) after septic shock. ⋯ ICU survivors referred to rehabilitation centers after SPG-related amputations had impaired HRQOL. At the time of HRQOL assessment, they considered themselves in good health and preferred to be treated again despite disability. Appraisal of long-term functional outcome should not be used to guide end-of-life decision-making in this situation.