Journal of critical care
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2023
Review Meta AnalysisOptimal dosing of heparin for prophylactic anticoagulation in critically ill COVID-19 patients a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
The optimal amount of anticoagulation for critically ill COVID-19 patients is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of escalated doses of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19. ⋯ This systematic review and meta-analysis fail to support escalated anticoagulation doses to reduce mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, higher doses of anticoagulants appear to reduce thrombotic events while increasing the risk of bleeding effectively.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2023
Review Meta AnalysisEffects of tracheostomy timing in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of multiple tracheostomy timings using data from randomized control trials (RCTs) to investigate the impact on patient prognosis. ⋯ Tracheostomy ≤4 days may result in lower short-term mortality than tracheostomy ≥13 days.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2023
Multicenter StudyDisparities between randomized clinical trial participants and sepsis patients in real-world.
The external validity or "generalizability" of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often needs be considered when making treatment decisions. We evaluate whether participants in large multicenter RCTs investigating sepsis were similar in age, disease severity, comorbidities, and mortality to the general population of sepsis patients. ⋯ On average, trial participants were younger than the general sepsis patient population. Commercial support influenced patient selection. Efforts to understand and address the above-described patient disparities are necessary to improve the generalizability of RCT results.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2023
ReviewLinking Sepsis with chronic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and socioeconomic factors in the United States: A scoping review.
Sepsis is a syndrome of life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host immune response to infection. Social risk factors including location and poverty are associated with sepsis-related disparities. Understanding the social and biological phenotypes linked with the incidence of sepsis is warranted to identify the most at-risk populations. We aim to examine how factors in disadvantage influence health disparities related to sepsis. ⋯ The distribution of chronic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, social risk factors associated with socioeconomic disadvantage, and sepsis incidence, are clustered in specific geographical areas and linked by endothelial dysfunction. Such population factors can be utilized to create equitable interventions aimed at mitigating sepsis incidence and sepsis-related disparities.