Pediatric hematology and oncology
-
Pediatr Hematol Oncol · Sep 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of tropisetron and granisetron in the control of nausea and vomiting in children receiving combined cancer chemotherapy.
Tropisetron and granisetron are selective serotonin (5-HT3) antagonists that have been proven effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in adults and children receiving cancer chemotherapy. This prospective, randomised study was designed to compare the efficacy of the two agents in the prevention of vomiting and nausea in children receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy for various malignancies. A total of 51 children (mean age: 7.7 +/- 4.8 year) were studied in 133 chemotherapy cycles. ⋯ There were no differences in the tolerability of the two antiemetic therapy modalities. In conclusion, granisetron was found to be more effective than tropisetron in controlling nausea and vomiting in children receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. This increased antiemetic efficacy of ganisetron might have been related to maximal dose differences according to body weight.
-
Pediatr Hematol Oncol · Sep 2000
Comment Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of oral ondansetron syrup or intravenous ondansetron loading dose regimens given in combination with dexamethasone for the prevention of nausea and emesis in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving moderately/highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
This double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous (i.v.) ondansetron with oral syrup ondansetron plus oral dexamethasone in the prevention of nausea and emesis in pediatric patients receiving moderately/highly emetogenic chemotherapy. On each day of chemotherapy, patients were administered ondansetron 5 mg/m2 i.v. and placebo syrup orally (n = 215) or ondansetron 8 mg syrup orally and placebo i.v. (n = 223) plus dexamethasone 2-4 mg p.o. ⋯ Complete or major control of emesis was obtained in 89% patients in the i.v. group and 88% patients in the oral syrup group during the worst day of chemotherapy treatment (90% CI: -6, 4) and in 85% and 82% patients, respectively, during the worst day of the study period (90% CI: -8, 3). Intravenous or oral syrup ondansetron plus dexamethasone was well tolerated and effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced emesis in pediatric patients.
-
Pediatr Hematol Oncol · Mar 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialOndansetron and tropisetron in the control of nausea and vomiting in children receiving combined cancer chemotherapy.
Ondansetron (Zofron, Glaxo) and tropisetron (Navoban, Sandoz) are selective serotonin (5HT3) antagonists that have proven very effective in the prevention of vomiting and nausea in adults and children receiving cancer chemotherapy. This study compared the efficacy of the two agents in the prevention of vomiting and nausea in children receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors and blood malignancies. A total of 23 children were studied in 205 chemotherapeutic cycles (116 one-day regimens and 89 multiple-day regimens). ⋯ The comparison of the two groups not taking into consideration the emetogenicity of the chemotherapeutic agents showed that ondansetron was more effective in 1-day regimens (P = .023), whereas the two agents were equally effective in multiple-day regimens (P = .2). The statistical analysis depending on the emetogenicity of the chemotherapeutic agents showed increased efficacy of ondansetron in mild (P = .017) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents, whereas there was no difference in the highly emetogenic drug group. Ondansetron is found to be more effective than tropisetron in controlling acute nausea and vomiting in children receiving mild and moderately emetogenic chemotherapeutic drugs, although there is no difference in the efficacy of both antiemetic agents when highly emetogenic drugs are administered.
-
Pediatr Hematol Oncol · Oct 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAnalgesia in children with sickle cell crisis: comparison of intermittent opioids vs. continuous intravenous infusion of morphine and placebo-controlled study of oxygen inhalation.
The objectives of the study were to compare the efficacy and safety of a continuous infusion (CIV) of morphine and intermittent parenteral opioids (IPO) in children with sickle cell vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs); to determine whether 50% oxygen administration through a face mask can reduce the duration of severe pain in patients receiving CIV morphine; and to measure morphine concentration at steady state for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis in patients receiving CIV morphine. The study was designed as a prospective, controlled, "before-and-after" evaluation of two different analgesic regimens. For patients receiving CIV morphine, there was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of O2 vs. air. ⋯ Total body clearance (TBC) of morphine was greater in children before puberty than after (40.4 +/- 10 vs. 28 +/- 11 mL/kg/min; p < 0.05). In conclusion, in children with severe VOCs, continuous infusion of morphine provides better analgesia than intermittent opioid therapy. Fifty percent oxygen inhalation had no effect on the duration of pain.