Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol, alfentanil, and oxygen-air: three different dosage schemes.
Three different dosage schemes of propofol infusions combined with a fixed-rate alfentanil infusion were investigated in total intravenous anaesthesia. In 30 premedicated patients, divided at random into three groups, anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg.kg-1 immediately followed by an alfentanil infusion 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 as a loading dose which was decreased after ten minutes to a maintenance dose of 1 microgram.kg-1.min-1. Vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg.kg-1 was used as the muscle relaxant. ⋯ Awareness did not occur in any patient. The only difference between the three groups was the higher number of supplementary bolus doses of propofol and alfentanil needed in group A (P less than 0.01). In total intravenous anaesthesia propofol 3 and 4 mg.kg-1.hr-1 as a maintenance dose combined with a two-step fixed-rate alfentanil infusion provided smooth anaesthesia and uneventful rapid recovery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of lidocaine CO2, two per cent lidocaine hydrochloride and pH adjusted lidocaine hydrochloride for caesarean section anesthesia.
Lidocaine can be prepared in a variety of ways which may affect the characteristics of neural blockade achieved. Experimental evidence is equivocal as to the clinical impact of the use of different lidocaine preparations. ⋯ A significant difference was found between the pH's of the solutions used. It is concluded that all three solutions are equally efficacious in epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
-
Thirty infants scheduled for a variety of gastrointestinal, genitourinary and thoracic surgical procedures were selected for insertion of lumbar or thoracic epidural catheters via the caudal approach using either an Intracath or a Burron continuous brachial plexus kit. The catheters were inserted with ease by residents in training and no catheter-related complications were encountered. Lidocaine 0.5 per cent with 1:200,000 epinephrine was then injected to assure proper placement of the catheter before narcotics were administered. ⋯ Urinary retention occurred in two infants and one infant became apnoeic three hours after epidural morphine administration but responded to naloxone and pulmonary ventilation with bag and mask. In conclusion, epidural catheters placed via the caudal approach are a safe and effective means of providing postoperative pain control in infants using preservative-free morphine. However, the use of epidural narcotics in infants less than two years of age is restricted to those who will receive intensive care unit monitoring postoperatively so that if apnoea occurs, rapid intervention can be taken by skilled nursing personnel.
-
To determine the accuracy of end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) measurements analyzed with a sidestream capnometer in infants and children whose lungs were ventilated with a Sechrist infant ventilator and an Ayre's t-piece, we compared PETCO2 measurements obtained from the proximal (PETCO2-p) and distal (PETCO2-d) ends of the tracheal tube to arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) in 37 healthy infants and children between 1.3 and 24.5 kg. Both PETCO2-p and PETCO2-d accurately approximated PaCO2, however, the mean (+/- SD) arterial to end-tidal PCO2 difference (delta(a-ET)PCO2) was significantly greater with proximal (1.27 +/- 1.54 mmHg) than with distal sampling (0.64 +/- 1.64 mmHg) (P less than 0.01). In the subgroup of patients who weighted less than 12 kg, the delta(a-ET)PCO2 using proximal gas sampling (1.94 +/- 1.29 mmHg) was also significantly greater than it was using distal sampling (0.74 +/- 1.31 mmHg) (P less than 0.001). We conclude that although statistically different, both proximal and distal estimates of PETCO2 provide acceptable estimates of PaCO2 in healthy infants and children who are ventilated with a Sechrist infant ventilator and an Ayre's t-piece system.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Fluid through the epidural needle does not reduce complications of epidural catheter insertion.
Epidural catheter insertion may be associated with blood vessel trauma or nerve root irritation. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the injection of small amounts of fluid through the Tuohy needle prior to catheter insertion reduced the incidence of these and other minor complications. ⋯ There were no differences among the groups in the incidence of blood vessel trauma or paraesthesiae. We conclude that there is no advantage in injecting of fluid routinely into the epidural space prior to catheter insertion.