Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of epidural and patient-controlled intravenous morphine following joint replacement surgery.
The authors conducted a randomized, prospective study comparing epidural morphine with patient-controlled intravenous (iv) morphine in 30 patients recovering from total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Six, 18, and 24 hr postoperatively, patients used a 10 cm visual-analogue scale to indicate both their current degree of discomfort and the maximum discomfort they had experienced since the previous evaluation. Pain at the time of evaluation did not differ between patients receiving epidural (2.6 +/- 0.4 cm, mean +/- SEM) and patient-controlled iv morphine (3.4 +/- 0.3 cm). ⋯ Patients receiving epidural morphine were more likely to require treatment for pruritus (4 of 15) than patients who received patient-controlled iv morphine (none of 15, P less than 0.05). Minimum respiratory rates were lower in patients receiving epidural morphine (15.0 +/- 0.3) than in those receiving patient-controlled analgesia (16.5 +/- 0.4, P less than 0.05), but no patients required treatment for respiratory depression. The authors conclude that epidural morphine may provide more consistent analgesia following joint replacement surgery than patient-controlled morphine; however, there is a higher incidence of side-effects with the epidural technique.
-
To ascertain the anaesthetic complications requiring post-anaesthetic respiratory support in a large obstetrical hospital, the hospital records of obstetrical patients admitted to an adjacent general intensive care unit (ICU) were studied. Obstetrical patients who required mechanical ventilation following anaesthetic complications were identified and their hospital records reviewed. In a ten-year period there were 61,435 women delivered at the Mater Mothers Hospital (MMH) in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. ⋯ Complications included anaphylaxis, high block and failure of tracheal intubation. The incidence of a major complication of a GA causing admission to the ICU was 1 in 932 and for RA was 1 in 4177 when these were given for delivery (P less than 0.01). If a complication requiring ICU admission and mechanical ventilation is used as the criterion of safety it appears that RA is safer than a GA for delivery.